Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 375

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The many manifestations of downsizing: hierarchical galaxy formation models confront observations

Open access
Fontanot, Fabio, De Lucia, Gabriella, Monaco, Pierluigi, Somerville, Rachel S., Santini, Paola·2009·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15058.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

It has been widely claimed that several lines of observational evidence point towards a ‘downsizing’ of the process of galaxy formation over cosmic time. This behaviour is sometimes termed ‘antihierarchical’, and contrasted with the ‘bottom-up’ (small objects form first) assembly of the dark matter structures in cold dark matter (CDM) models. In this paper, we address three different kinds of observational evidence that have been described as ‘downsizing’: the stellar mass assembly (i.e. more massive galaxies assemble at higher redshift with respect to low-mass ones), star formation rate (SFR) (i.e. the decline of the specific star formation rate is faster for more massive systems) and the ages of the stellar populations in local galaxies (i.e. more massive galaxies host older stellar populations). We compare a broad compilation of available data sets with the predictions of three different semi-analytic models of galaxy formation within the ΛCDM framework. In the data, we see only weak evidence at best of ‘downsizing’ in stellar mass and in SFR. Despite the different implementations of the physical recipes, the three models agree remarkably well in their predictions. We find that, when observational errors on stellar mass and SFR are taken into account, the models acceptably reproduce the evolution of massive galaxies (M > 1011 M⊙ in stellar mass), over the entire redshift range that we consider (0 ≲z≲ 4). However, lower mass galaxies, in the stellar mass range 109–1011 M⊙, are formed too early in the models and are too passive at late times. Thus, the models do not correctly reproduce the downsizing trend in stellar mass or the archaeological downsizing, while they qualitatively reproduce the mass-dependent evolution of the SFR. We demonstrate that these discrepancies are not solely due to a poor treatment of satellite galaxies but are mainly connected to the excessively efficient formation of central galaxies in high-redshift haloes with circular velocities ∼100–200 km s−1. We conclude that some physical processes operating on these mass scales – most probably star formation and/or supernova feedback – are not yet properly treated in these models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15058.x

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 87 references

Cited by

See all 375

Metadata

Authors
Fontanot, F., De Lucia, G., Monaco, P., Somerville, R. S., & Santini, P.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2009-08-21
Volume
397
Issue
4
Pages
1776-1790
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
DOI
10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15058.x
OpenAlex
W2110797485
Cited by
375
References
87
FWCI
20.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The many manifestations of downsizing: hierarchical galaxy formation models confront observations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15058.x
The paper
Fontanot, F., De Lucia, G., Monaco, P., Somerville, R. S., & Santini, P. (2009). The many manifestations of downsizing: hierarchical galaxy formation models confront observations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15058.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.