The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The uncertainty in Galactic parameters
Open accessAbstract
We reanalyse the measurements of parallax, proper motion and line-of-sight velocity for 18 masers in high-mass star-forming regions presented by Reid et al. We use a likelihood analysis to investigate the distance of the Sun from the Galactic Centre, R0, the rotational speed of the local standard of rest, v0, and the peculiar velocity of the Sun, v⊙, for various models of the rotation curve and models which allow for a typical peculiar motion of the high-mass star-forming regions. We find that these data are best fit by models with non-standard values for v⊙ or a net peculiar motion of the high-mass star-forming regions. We argue that a correction to v⊙ is much more likely and these data support the conclusion of Binney that V⊙ should be revised upwards from 5.2 to 11 km s−1. We find that the values of R0 and v0 that we determine are heavily dependent on the model we use for rotation curve, with model-dependent estimates of R0 ranging from 6.7 ± 0.5 to 8.9 ± 0.9 kpc, and those of v0 ranging from 200 ± 20 to 279 ± 33 km s−1. We argue that these data cannot be thought of as implying any particular values of R0 or v0. However, we find that v0/R0 is better constrained, lying in the range 29.9 − 31.6 km s−1 kpc−1 for all models but one.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition
Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. (2008) · doi:10.1515/9781400828722 · Cited by 4,375
Self-citation
Cited by
Reid, M. J., Menten, K. M., Brunthaler, A., Zheng, X. W., Dame, T. M., Xu, Y., Wu, Y., Zhang, B., Sanna, A., Sato, M., et al. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/783/2/130 · Cited by 1,379
The mass distribution and gravitational potential of the Milky Way
McMillan, P. J. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2759 · Cited by 1,099
“They have therefore been used by numerous authors to constrain the properties of the Milky Way (e.g.,Reid et al. 2009a; McMillan & Binney 2010; Bovy et al. 2009; Bobylev & Bajkova 2013; Reid et al. 2014, Paper I).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationMcMillan, P. J. (2011) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18564.x · Cited by 789
Self-citationTHE MILKY WAY'S CIRCULAR-VELOCITY CURVE BETWEEN 4 AND 14 kpc FROM APOGEE DATA
Bovy, J., Allende Prieto, C., Beers, T. C., Bizyaev, D., da Costa, L. N., Cunha, K., Ebelke, G. L., Eisenstein, D. J., Frinchaboy, P. M., García Pérez, A. E., et al. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/759/2/131 · Cited by 413
Caswell, J. L., Fuller, G. A., Green, J. A., Avison, A., Breen, S. L., Brooks, K. J., Burton, M. G., Chrysostomou, A., Cox, J., Diamond, P. J., et al. (2010) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16339.x · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- McMillan, P. J., & Binney, J. J.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-02-21
- Volume
- 402
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 934-940
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2157257769
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The uncertainty in Galactic parameters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15932.x
- The paper
- McMillan, P. J., & Binney, J. J. (2010). The uncertainty in Galactic parameters. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15932.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.