Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 658

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RE-EXAMINING LARSON'S SCALING RELATIONSHIPS IN GALACTIC MOLECULAR CLOUDS

Open access
Heyer, Mark, Krawczyk, Coleman, Duval, Julia, Jackson, James M.·2009·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

The properties of Galactic molecular clouds tabulated by Solomon et al. (SRBY) are re-examined using the Boston University-FCRAO Galactic Ring Survey of 13 CO J = 1–0 emission. These new data provide a lower opacity tracer of molecular clouds and improved angular and spectral resolution compared with previous surveys of molecular line emission along the Galactic Plane. We calculate giant molecular cloud (GMC) masses within the SRBY cloud boundaries assuming local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) conditions throughout the cloud and a constant H 2 to 13 CO abundance, while accounting for the variation of the 12 C/ 13 C with galactocentric radius. The LTE-derived masses are typically five times smaller than the SRBY virial masses. The corresponding median mass surface density of molecular hydrogen for this sample is 42 M ☉ pc −2 , which is significantly lower than the value derived by SRBY (median 206 M ☉ pc −2 ) that has been widely adopted by most models of cloud evolution and star formation. This discrepancy arises from both the extrapolation by SRBY of velocity dispersion, size, and CO luminosity to the 1 K antenna temperature isophote that likely overestimates the GMC masses and our assumption of constant 13 CO abundance over the projected area of each cloud. Owing to the uncertainty of molecular abundances in the envelopes of clouds, the mass surface density of GMCs could be larger than the values derived from our 13 CO measurements. From velocity dispersions derived from the 13 CO data, we find that the coefficient of the cloud structure functions, v ° = σ v / R 1/2 , is not constant, as required to satisfy Larson's scaling relationships, but rather systematically varies with the surface density of the cloud as ∼Σ 0.5 as expected for clouds in self-gravitational equilibrium.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/699/2/1092

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 658

Metadata

Authors
Heyer, M., Krawczyk, C., Duval, J., & Jackson, J. M.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2009-06-18
Volume
699
Issue
2
Pages
1092-1103
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2043941242
Cited by
658
References
19
FWCI
20.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RE-EXAMINING LARSON'S SCALING RELATIONSHIPS IN GALACTIC MOLECULAR CLOUDS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/699/2/1092
The paper
Heyer, M., Krawczyk, C., Duval, J., & Jackson, J. M. (2009). RE-EXAMINING LARSON'S SCALING RELATIONSHIPS IN GALACTIC MOLECULAR CLOUDS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/699/2/1092

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.