Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 304

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tracing the molecular gas in distant submillimetre galaxies via CO(1-0) imaging with the Expanded Very Large Array: EVLA imaging of CO(1-0) in submm galaxies

Open access
Ivison, R. J., Papadopoulos, P. P., Smail, Ian, Greve, T. R., Thomson, A. P., Xilouris, E. M., Chapman, S. C.·2011·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We report the results of a pilot study with the EVLA of 12CO J=1-0 emission from four SMGs at z=2.2-2.5, each with an existing detection of CO J=3-2. Using the EVLA's most compact configuration we detect strong, broad J=1-0 line emission from all of our targets. The median line width ratio, sigma(1-0)/sigma(3-2) = 1.15 +/- 0.06, suggests that the J=1-0 is more spatially extended than the J=3-2 emission, a situation confirmed by our maps which reveal velocity structure in several cases and typical sizes of ~16 kpc FWHM. The median Tb ratio is r(3-2/1-0) = 0.55 +/- 0.05, noting that our value may be biased high because of the J=3-2-based sample selection. Naively, this suggests gas masses ~2x higher than estimates made using higher-J transitions of CO, with the discrepency due to the difference in assumed Tb ratio. We also estimate masses using the 12CO J=1-0 line and the observed global Tb ratios, assuming standard underlying Tb ratios as well as a limiting SFE, i.e. without calling upon X(CO). Using this new method, we find a median molecular gas mass of (2.5 +/- 0.8) x 10^10 Msun, with a plausible range stretching 3x higher. Even larger masses cannot be ruled out, but are not favoured by dynamical constraints: the median dynamical mass for our sample is (2.3 +/- 1.4) x 10^11 Msun. We examine the Schmidt-Kennicutt relation for all the distant galaxy populations for which CO J=1-0 or J=2-1 data are available, finding small systematic differences. These have previously been interpreted as evidence for different modes of star formation, but we argue that these differences are to be expected, given the still considerable uncertainties. Finally, we discuss the morass of degeneracies surrounding molecular gas mass estimates, the possibilities for breaking them, and the future prospects for imaging and studying cold, quiescent molecular gas at high redshifts [abridged].

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18028.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 304

Metadata

Authors
Ivison, R. J., Papadopoulos, P. P., Smail, I., Greve, T. R., Thomson, A. P., Xilouris, E. M., & Chapman, S. C.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2011-01-17
Volume
412
Issue
3
Pages
1913-1925
ISSN
0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1691278430
Cited by
304
References
1
FWCI
18.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tracing the molecular gas in distant submillimetre galaxies via CO(1-0) imaging with the Expanded Very Large Array: EVLA imaging of CO(1-0) in submm galaxies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18028.x
The paper
Ivison, R. J., Papadopoulos, P. P., Smail, I., Greve, T. R., Thomson, A. P., Xilouris, E. M., & Chapman, S. C. (2011). Tracing the molecular gas in distant submillimetre galaxies via CO(1-0) imaging with the Expanded Very Large Array: EVLA imaging of CO(1-0) in submm galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18028.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.