Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 765

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Milky Way’s bright satellites as an apparent failure of ΛCDM: The MW’s bright satellites in ΛCDM

Open access
Boylan-Kolchin, Michael, Bullock, James S., Kaplinghat, Manoj·2012·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We use the Aquarius simulations to show that the most massive subhaloes in galaxy-mass dark matter (DM) haloes in Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) are grossly inconsistent with the dynamics of the brightest Milky Way dwarf spheroidal galaxies. While the best-fitting hosts of the dwarf spheroidals all have ⁠, ΛCDM simulations predict at least 10 subhaloes with Vmax > 25 km s−1. These subhaloes are also among the most massive at earlier times, and significantly exceed the reionization suppression mass back to z∼ 10. No ΛCDM-based model of the satellite population of the Milky Way explains this result. The problem lies in the satellites’ densities: it is straightforward to match the observed Milky Way luminosity function, but doing so requires the dwarf spheroidals to have DM haloes that are a factor of ∼5 more massive than is observed. Independent of the difficulty in explaining the absence of these dense, massive subhaloes, there is a basic tension between the derived properties of the bright Milky Way dwarf spheroidals and ΛCDM expectations. The inferred infall masses of these galaxies are all approximately equal and are much lower than standard ΛCDM predictions for systems with their luminosities. Consequently, their implied star formation efficiencies span over two orders of magnitude, from 0.2 to 20 per cent of baryons converted into stars, in stark contrast with expectations gleaned from more massive galaxies. We explore possible solutions to these problems within the context of ΛCDM and find them to be unconvincing. In particular, we use controlled simulations to demonstrate that the small stellar masses of the bright dwarf spheroidals make supernova feedback an unlikely explanation for their low inferred densities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20695.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 765

Metadata

Authors
Boylan-Kolchin, M., Bullock, J. S., & Kaplinghat, M.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2012-03-16
Volume
422
Issue
2
Pages
1203-1218
ISSN
0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1856433076
Cited by
765
References
4
FWCI
43.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Milky Way’s bright satellites as an apparent failure of ΛCDM: The MW’s bright satellites in ΛCDM. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20695.x
The paper
Boylan-Kolchin, M., Bullock, J. S., & Kaplinghat, M. (2012). The Milky Way’s bright satellites as an apparent failure of ΛCDM: The MW’s bright satellites in ΛCDM. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20695.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.