Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: analysis of potential systematics: Systematic analysis of BOSS 3D clustering

Open access
Ross, Ashley J., Percival, Will J., Sánchez, Ariel G., Samushia, Lado, Ho, Shirley, Kazin, Eyal, Manera, Marc, Reid, Beth, White, Martin, Tojeiro, Rita, McBride, Cameron K., Xu, Xiaoying, Wake, David A., Strauss, Michael A., Montesano, Francesco, Swanson, Molly E. C., Bailey, Stephen, Bolton, Adam S., Dorta, Antonio Montero, Eisenstein, Daniel J., Guo, Hong, Hamilton, Jean-Christophe, Nichol, Robert C., Padmanabhan, Nikhil, Prada, Francisco, Schlegel, David J., Magaña, Mariana Vargas, Zehavi, Idit, Blanton, Michael, Bizyaev, Dmitry, Brewington, Howard, Cuesta, Antonio J., Malanushenko, Elena, Malanushenko, Viktor, Oravetz, Daniel, Parejko, John, Pan, Kaike, Schneider, Donald P., Shelden, Alaina, Simmons, Audrey, Snedden, Stephanie, Zhao, Gong-bo·2012·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We analyse the density field of galaxies observed by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS)-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) included in the SDSS Data Release Nine (DR9). DR9 includes spectroscopic redshifts for over 400 000 galaxies spread over a footprint of 3275 deg2. We identify, characterize and mitigate the impact of sources of systematic uncertainty on large-scale clustering measurements, both for angular moments of the redshift-space correlation function, ξℓ(s), and the spherically averaged power spectrum, P(k), in order to ensure that robust cosmological constraints will be obtained from these data. A correlation between the projected density of stars and the higher redshift (0.43 < z < 0.7) galaxy sample (the approximately constant stellar mass threshold ‘CMASS’ sample) due to imaging systematics imparts a systematic error that is larger than the statistical error of the clustering measurements at scales s > 120 h−1 Mpc or k < 0.01 h Mpc−1. We find that these errors can be ameliorated by weighting galaxies based on their surface brightness and the local stellar density. The clustering of CMASS galaxies found in the Northern and Southern Galactic footprints of the survey generally agrees to within 2σ. We use mock galaxy catalogues that simulate the CMASS selection function to determine that randomly selecting galaxy redshifts in order to simulate the radial selection function of a random sample imparts the least systematic error on ξℓ(s) measurements and that this systematic error is negligible for the spherically averaged correlation function, ξ0. We find a peak in ξ0 at s∼ 200 h−1 Mpc, with a corresponding feature with period ∼0.03 h Mpc−1 in P(k), and find features at least as strong in 4.8 per cent of the mock galaxy catalogues, concluding this feature is likely to be a consequence of cosmic variance. The methods we recommend for the calculation of clustering measurements using the CMASS sample are adopted in companion papers that locate the position of the baryon acoustic oscillation feature, constrain cosmological models using the full shape of ξ0 and measure the rate of structure growth.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21235.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 277

Metadata

Authors
Ross, A. J., Percival, W. J., Sánchez, A. G., Samushia, L., Ho, S., Kazin, E., Manera, M., Reid, B., White, M., Tojeiro, R., McBride, C. K., Xu, X., Wake, D. A., Strauss, M. A., Montesano, F., Swanson, M. E. C., Bailey, S., Bolton, A. S., Dorta, A. M., Eisenstein, D. J., Guo, H., Hamilton, J.-C., Nichol, R. C., Padmanabhan, N., Prada, F., Schlegel, D. J., Magaña, M. V., Zehavi, I., Blanton, M., Bizyaev, D., Brewington, H., Cuesta, A. J., Malanushenko, E., Malanushenko, V., Oravetz, D., Parejko, J., Pan, K., Schneider, D. P., Shelden, A., Simmons, A., Snedden, S., & Zhao, G.-B.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2012-06-19
Volume
424
Issue
1
Pages
564-590
ISSN
0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142145978
Cited by
277
References
5
FWCI
14.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: analysis of potential systematics: Systematic analysis of BOSS 3D clustering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21235.x
The paper
Ross, A. J., Percival, W. J., Sánchez, A. G., Samushia, L., Ho, S., Kazin, E., Manera, M., Reid, B., White, M., Tojeiro, R., McBride, C. K., Xu, X., Wake, D. A., Strauss, M. A., Montesano, F., Swanson, M. E. C., Bailey, S., Bolton, A. S., Dorta, A. M., . . . Zhao, G.-B. (2012). The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: analysis of potential systematics: Systematic analysis of BOSS 3D clustering. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21235.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.