The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: analysis of potential systematics: Systematic analysis of BOSS 3D clustering
Open accessAbstract
We analyse the density field of galaxies observed by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS)-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) included in the SDSS Data Release Nine (DR9). DR9 includes spectroscopic redshifts for over 400 000 galaxies spread over a footprint of 3275 deg2. We identify, characterize and mitigate the impact of sources of systematic uncertainty on large-scale clustering measurements, both for angular moments of the redshift-space correlation function, ξℓ(s), and the spherically averaged power spectrum, P(k), in order to ensure that robust cosmological constraints will be obtained from these data. A correlation between the projected density of stars and the higher redshift (0.43 < z < 0.7) galaxy sample (the approximately constant stellar mass threshold ‘CMASS’ sample) due to imaging systematics imparts a systematic error that is larger than the statistical error of the clustering measurements at scales s > 120 h−1 Mpc or k < 0.01 h Mpc−1. We find that these errors can be ameliorated by weighting galaxies based on their surface brightness and the local stellar density. The clustering of CMASS galaxies found in the Northern and Southern Galactic footprints of the survey generally agrees to within 2σ. We use mock galaxy catalogues that simulate the CMASS selection function to determine that randomly selecting galaxy redshifts in order to simulate the radial selection function of a random sample imparts the least systematic error on ξℓ(s) measurements and that this systematic error is negligible for the spherically averaged correlation function, ξ0. We find a peak in ξ0 at s∼ 200 h−1 Mpc, with a corresponding feature with period ∼0.03 h Mpc−1 in P(k), and find features at least as strong in 4.8 per cent of the mock galaxy catalogues, concluding this feature is likely to be a consequence of cosmic variance. The methods we recommend for the calculation of clustering measurements using the CMASS sample are adopted in companion papers that locate the position of the baryon acoustic oscillation feature, constrain cosmological models using the full shape of ξ0 and measure the rate of structure growth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305772 · Cited by 15,126
Self-citationThe Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric System
Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., Doi, M., Shimasaku, K., & Schneider, D. P. (1996) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/117915 · Cited by 3,033
Self-citationBaryon acoustic oscillations in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 galaxy sample
Percival, W. J., Reid, B. A., Eisenstein, D. J., Bahcall, N. A., Budavari, T., Frieman, J. A., Fukugita, M., Gunn, J. E., Ivezić, Ž., Knapp, G. R., et al. (2010) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15812.x · Cited by 1,846 · cited 1×
“These maps encode a wealth of information on cosmology (e.g. Tegmark et al. 2004; Cole et al. 2005; Eisenstein et al. 2005; Percival et al. 2010; Reid et al. 2010; Blake et al. 2011; Montesano, Sanchez & Phleps 2011) and the nature of galaxies (e.g. Norberg et al. 2002; Gómez et al. 2003; Swanson…”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric Camera
Gunn, J. E., Carr, M., Rockosi, C., Sekiguchi, M., Berry, K., Elms, B., de Haas, E., Ivezić, Ž., Knapp, G., Lupton, R., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300645 · Cited by 1,692
Self-citationAn Improved Photometric Calibration of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Imaging Data
Padmanabhan, N., Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., Barentine, J. C., Blanton, M. R., Brewington, H. J., Gunn, J. E., Harvanek, M., Hogg, D. W., Ivezić, Ž., et al. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/524677 · Cited by 591
Self-citation
Cited by
Alam, S., Ata, M., Bailey, S., Beutler, F., Bizyaev, D., Blazek, J. A., Bolton, A. S., Brownstein, J. R., Burden, A., Chuang, C.-H., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx721 · Cited by 3,056
Self-citationTHE BARYON OSCILLATION SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY OF SDSS-III
Dawson, K. S., Schlegel, D. J., Ahn, C. P., Anderson, S. F., Aubourg, É., Bailey, S., Barkhouser, R. H., Bautista, J. E., Beifiori, A., Berlind, A. A., et al. (2013) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/145/1/10 · Cited by 2,051
Self-citationThe clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sample – I. A 4 per cent distance measure at z=0.15
Ross, A. J., Samushia, L., Howlett, C., Percival, W. J., Burden, A., & Manera, M. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv154 · Cited by 1,745
“This procedure was shown to impart negligible bias on BOSS clustering measurements in Ross et al. (2012), and in Paper II (Howlett et al. 2014b) it is shown that it makes a negligible difference for our MGS sample.”
MethodSelf-citationAnderson, L., Aubourg, E., Bailey, S., Bizyaev, D., Blanton, M., Bolton, A. S., Brinkmann, J., Brownstein, J. R., Burden, A., Cuesta, A. J., et al. (2012) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22066.x · Cited by 893
Self-citationTHE SDSS-IV EXTENDED BARYON OSCILLATION SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY: OVERVIEW AND EARLY DATA
Dawson, K. S., Kneib, J.-P., Percival, W. J., Alam, S., Albareti, F. D., Anderson, S. F., Armengaud, E., Aubourg, É., Bailey, S., Bautista, J. E., et al. (2016) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/44 · Cited by 844
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ross, A. J., Percival, W. J., Sánchez, A. G., Samushia, L., Ho, S., Kazin, E., Manera, M., Reid, B., White, M., Tojeiro, R., McBride, C. K., Xu, X., Wake, D. A., Strauss, M. A., Montesano, F., Swanson, M. E. C., Bailey, S., Bolton, A. S., Dorta, A. M., Eisenstein, D. J., Guo, H., Hamilton, J.-C., Nichol, R. C., Padmanabhan, N., Prada, F., Schlegel, D. J., Magaña, M. V., Zehavi, I., Blanton, M., Bizyaev, D., Brewington, H., Cuesta, A. J., Malanushenko, E., Malanushenko, V., Oravetz, D., Parejko, J., Pan, K., Schneider, D. P., Shelden, A., Simmons, A., Snedden, S., & Zhao, G.-B.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-06-19
- Volume
- 424
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 564-590
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142145978
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 14.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: analysis of potential systematics: Systematic analysis of BOSS 3D clustering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21235.x
- The paper
- Ross, A. J., Percival, W. J., Sánchez, A. G., Samushia, L., Ho, S., Kazin, E., Manera, M., Reid, B., White, M., Tojeiro, R., McBride, C. K., Xu, X., Wake, D. A., Strauss, M. A., Montesano, F., Swanson, M. E. C., Bailey, S., Bolton, A. S., Dorta, A. M., . . . Zhao, G.-B. (2012). The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: analysis of potential systematics: Systematic analysis of BOSS 3D clustering. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21235.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.