Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 239

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Black hole growth to z = 2 - I. Improved virial methods for measuring MBH and L/LEdd

Open access
Trakhtenbrot, B., Netzer, H.·2012·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We analyse several large samples of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) in order to establish the best tools required to study the evolution of black hole mass (MBH) and normalized accretion rate (L/LEdd). The data include spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, 2dF QSO Redshift survey and 2dF SDSS LRG And QSO survey public surveys at z < 2, and a compilation of smaller samples with 0 < z < 5. We critically evaluate the usage of the Mg ii λ2798 and C iv λ1549 lines, and adjacent continuum bands, as estimators of MBH and L/LEdd, by focusing on sources where one of these lines is observed together with Hβ. We present a new, luminosity-dependent bolometric correction for the monochromatic luminosity at 3000 Å, L3000, which is lower by a factor of ∼1.75 than those used in previous studies. We also re-calibrate the use of L3000 as an indicator for the size of the broad emission-line region (RBLR) and find that , in agreement with previous results. We find that for all sources with . Beyond this full width at half-maximum (FWHM), the Mg ii line width seems to saturate. The spectral region of the Mg ii line can thus be used to reproduce Hβ-based estimates of MBH and L/LEdd, with negligible systematic differences and a scatter of ∼0.3 dex. The width of the C iv line, on the other hand, shows no correlation with either that of the Hβ or the Mg ii lines and we could not identify the reason for this discrepancy. The scatter of MBH(C iv), relative to MBH(Hβ), is of almost 0.5 dex. Moreover, 46 per cent of the sources have , in contrast with the basic premise of the virial method, which predicts , based on reverberation mapping experiments. This fundamental discrepancy cannot be corrected based on the continuum slope or any C iv-related observable. Thus, the C iv line cannot be used to obtain precise estimates of MBH. We conclude by presenting the observed evolution of MBH and L/LEdd with cosmic epoch. The steep rise of L/LEdd with redshift up to z ≃ 1 flattens towards the expected maximal value of L/LEdd ≃ 1, with lower MBH sources showing higher values of L/LEdd at all redshifts. These trends will be further analysed in a forthcoming paper.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22056.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 239

Metadata

Authors
Trakhtenbrot, B., & Netzer, H.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2012-12-21
Volume
427
Issue
4
Pages
3081-3102
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2118288720
Cited by
239
References
2
FWCI
9.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Black hole growth to z = 2 - I. Improved virial methods for measuring MBH and L/LEdd. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22056.x
The paper
Trakhtenbrot, B., & Netzer, H. (2012). Black hole growth to z = 2 - I. Improved virial methods for measuring MBH and L/LEdd. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22056.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.