Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Low conductances for CO2 diffusion from stomata to the sites of carboxylation in leaves of woody species

LLOYD, J., SYVERTSEN, J. P., KRIEDEMANN, P. E., FARQUHAR, G. D.·1992·Plant, Cell & Environment

Abstract

Concurrent measurements of leaf gas exchange and on‐line 13 C discrimination were used to evaluate the CO 2 conductance to diffusion from the stomatal cavity to the sites of carboxylation within the chloroplast (internal conductance; g i). When photon irradiance was varied it appeared that gi and/or the discrimination accompanying carboxylation also varied. Despite this problem, gi, was estimated for leaves of peach (Prunus persica), grapefruit (Citrus paradisi), lemon (C. limon) and macadamia (Macadamia integrifolia) at saturating photon irradiance. Estimates for leaves of C. paradisi, C. limon and M. integrifolia were considerably lower than those previously reported for well‐nourished herbaceous plants and ranged from 1.1 to2.2μmol CO 2 m−2 s−1 Pa−1, whilst P. persica had a mean value of 3.5 μmol CO 2 m−2 s−1 Pa−1. At an ambient CO 2 partial pressure of 33Pa, estimates of chloroplastic partial pressure of CO 2 (Cc) using measurements of CO 2 assimilation rate (A) and calculated values of gi, and of partial pressure of CO 2 in the stomatal cavity (Cst) were as low as 11.2 Pa for C. limon and as high as 17.8Pa for peach. In vivo maximum rubisco activities (V max) were also determined from estimates of Cc. This calculation showed that for a given leaf nitrogen concentration (area basis) C. paradisi and C. limon leaves had a lower V max than P. persica, with C. paradisi and C. limon estimated to have only 10% of leaf nitrogen present as rubisco. Therefore, low CO 2 assimilation rates despite high leaf nitrogen concentrations in leaves of the evergreen species examined were explained not only by a low C c but also by a relatively low proportion of leaf nitrogen being used for photosynthesis. We also show that simple one‐dimensional equations describing the relationship between leaf internal conductance from stomatal cavities to the sites of carboxylation and carbon isotope discrimination (Δ) can lead to errors in the estimate of gi. Potential effects of heterogeneity in stomatal aperture on carbon isotope discrimination may be particularly important and may lead to a dependence of gi upon CO 2 assimilation rate. It is shown that for any concurrent measurement of A and Δ, the estimate of Cc is an overestimate of the correct photosynthetic capacity‐weighted value, but this error is probably less than 1.0 Pa.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1992.tb01021.x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Metadata

Authors
LLOYD, J., SYVERTSEN, J. P., KRIEDEMANN, P. E., & FARQUHAR, G. D.
Venue
Plant, Cell & Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-10
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
873-899
ISSN
  • 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3040
OpenAlex
W2067649092
Cited by
300
References
24
FWCI
4.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low conductances for CO2 diffusion from stomata to the sites of carboxylation in leaves of woody species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1992.tb01021.x
The paper
LLOYD, J., SYVERTSEN, J. P., KRIEDEMANN, P. E., & FARQUHAR, G. D. (1992). Low conductances for CO2 diffusion from stomata to the sites of carboxylation in leaves of woody species. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1992.tb01021.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.