The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In situ estimation of net CO2 assimilation, photosynthetic electron flow and photorespiration in Turkey oak (Q. cerris L.) leaves: diurnal cycles under different levels of water supply
Abstract
Diurnal time courses of net CO 2 assimilation rates, stomatal conductance and light‐driven electron fluxes were measured in situ on attached leaves of 30‐year‐old Turkey oak trees (Quercus cerris L.) under natural summer conditions in central Italy. Combined measurements of gas exchange and chlorophyll a fluorescence under low O 2 concentrations allowed the demonstration of a linear relationship between the photochemical efficiency of PSII (fluorescence measurements) and the apparent quantum yield of gross photosynthesis (gas exchange). This relationship was used under normal O 2 to compute total light‐driven electron fluxes, and to partition them into fractions used for RuBP carboxylation or RuBP oxygenation. This procedure also yielded an indirect estimate of the rate of photorespiration in vivo. The time courses of light‐driven electron flow, net CO 2 assimilation and photorespiration paralleled that of photosynthetic photon flux density, with important afternoon deviations as soon as a severe drought stress occurred, whereas photochemical efficiency and maximal fluorescence underwent large but reversible diurnal decreases. The latter observation indicated the occurrence of a large non‐photochemical energy dissipation at PSII. We estimated that less than 60% of the total photosynthetic electron flow was used for carbon assimilation at midday, while about 40% was devoted to photorespiration. The rate of carbon loss by photorespiration (R1) reached mean levels of 56% of net assimilation rates. The potential application of this technique to analysis of the relative contributions of thermal de‐excitation at PSII and photorespiratory carbon recycling in the protection of photosynthesis against stress effects is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide
Maxwell, K., & Johnson, G. N. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659 · Cited by 9,347
Long, S. P. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erg262 · Cited by 1,252
MEDRANO, H. (2002) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcf079 · Cited by 1,021
Flexas, J., Bota, J., Escalona, J. M., Sampol, B., & Medrano, H. (2002) · Australian Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1071/pp01119 · Cited by 701
Galmés, J., Medrano, H., & Flexas, J. (2007) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02087.x · Cited by 609
Metadata
- Authors
- VALENTINI, R., EPRON, D., DE ANGELIS, P., MATTEUCCI, G., & DREYER, E.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 631-640
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W1980396438
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In situ estimation of net CO2 assimilation, photosynthetic electron flow and photorespiration in Turkey oak (Q. cerris L.) leaves: diurnal cycles under different levels of water supply. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00564.x
- The paper
- VALENTINI, R., EPRON, D., DE ANGELIS, P., MATTEUCCI, G., & DREYER, E. (1995). In situ estimation of net CO2 assimilation, photosynthetic electron flow and photorespiration in Turkey oak (Q. cerris L.) leaves: diurnal cycles under different levels of water supply. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00564.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.