The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stomatal responses to increased CO2: implications from the plant to the global scale
Abstract
Increased atmospheric CO 2 often but not always leads to large decreases in leaf conductance. Decreased leaf conductance has important implications for a number of components of CO 2 responses, from the plant to the global scale. All of the factors that are sensitive to a change in soil moisture, either amount or timing, may be affected by increased CO 2. The list of potentially sensitive processes includes soil evaporation, run‐off, decomposition, and physiological adjustments of plants, as well as factors such as canopy development and the composition of the plant and microbial communities. Experimental evidence concerning ecosystem‐scale consequences of the effects of CO 2 on water use is only beginning to accumulate, but the initial indication is that, in water‐limited areas, the effects of CO 2‐induced changes in leaf conductance are comparable in importance to those of CO,2‐induced changes in photosynthesis. Above the leaf scale, a number of processes interact to modulate the response of canopy or regional evapotran‐spiration to increased CO 2. While some components of these processes tend to amplify the sensitivity of evapo‐transpiration to altered leaf conductance, the most likely overall pattern is one in which the responses of canopy and regional evapotranspiration are substantially smaller than the responses of canopy conductance. The effects of increased CO 2 on canopy evapotranspiration are likely to be smallest in aerodynamically smooth canopies with high leaf conductances. Under these circumstances, which are largely restricted to agriculture, decreases in evapotranspiration may be only one‐fourth as large as decreases in canopy conductance. Decreased canopy conductances over large regions may lead to altered climate, including increased temperature and decreased precipitation. The simulation experiments to date predict small effects globally, but these could be important regionally, especially in combination with radiative (greenhouse) effects of increased CO 2.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass
Penman, H. L. (1948) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1948.0037 · Cited by 7,307
On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters
PRIESTLEY, C. H. B., & TAYLOR, R. J. (1972) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100<0081:otaosh>2.3.co;2 · Cited by 6,574
Resource Limitation in Plants-An Economic Analogy
Bloom, A. J., Chapin, F. S., & Mooney, H. A. (1985) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.002051 · Cited by 2,725
Self-citationBall, J. T., Woodrow, I. E., & Berry, J. A. (1987) · Progress in Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0519-6_48 · Cited by 2,496
Collatz, G. J., Ball, J. T., Grivet, C., & Berry, J. A. (1991) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/0168-1923(91)90002-8 · Cited by 2,270
Prentice, I. C., Cramer, W., Harrison, S. P., Leemans, R., Monserud, R. A., & Solomon, A. M. (1992) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.2307/2845499 · Cited by 2,106
Stomatal Control of Transpiration: Scaling Up from Leaf to Region
Jarvis, P. G., & McNaughton, K. G. (1986) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60119-1 · Cited by 1,995
Evaporation and surface temperature
Monteith, J. L. (1981) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.49710745102 · Cited by 1,291
Influence of Land-Surface Evapotranspiration on the Earth's Climate
Shukla, J., & Mintz, Y. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.215.4539.1498 · Cited by 1,135
Stomatal function in relation to leaf metabolism and environment.
Cowan, I. R., & Farquhar, G. D. (1977) · PubMed · Cited by 1,020
Cited by
A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes
Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., & Schulze, E. D. (1996) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00333714 · Cited by 3,071
Self-citationMORE EFFICIENT PLANTS: A Consequence of Rising Atmospheric CO2?
Drake, B. G., Gonzàlez-Meler, M. A., & Long, S. P. (1997) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.609 · Cited by 1,925
Climate Impacts on Agriculture: Implications for Crop Production
Hatfield, J. L., Boote, K. J., Kimball, B. A., Ziska, L. H., Izaurralde, R. C., Ort, D., Thomson, A. M., & Wolfe, D. (2011) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2010.0303 · Cited by 1,645
Indirect radiative forcing of climate change through ozone effects on the land-carbon sink
Sitch, S., Cox, P. M., Collins, W. J., & Huntingford, C. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06059 · Cited by 1,019
Piao, S., Friedlingstein, P., Ciais, P., de Noblet-Ducoudré, N., Labat, D., & Zaehle, S. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0707213104 · Cited by 608
Metadata
- Authors
- FIELD, C. B., JACKSON, R. B., & MOONEY, H. A.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1214-1225
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2158784428
- Cited by
- 774
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 24.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stomatal responses to increased CO2: implications from the plant to the global scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00630.x
- The paper
- FIELD, C. B., JACKSON, R. B., & MOONEY, H. A. (1995). Stomatal responses to increased CO2: implications from the plant to the global scale. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00630.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.