Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 774

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stomatal responses to increased CO2: implications from the plant to the global scale

FIELD, C. B., JACKSON, R. B., MOONEY, H. A.·1995·Plant, Cell & Environment

Abstract

Increased atmospheric CO 2 often but not always leads to large decreases in leaf conductance. Decreased leaf conductance has important implications for a number of components of CO 2 responses, from the plant to the global scale. All of the factors that are sensitive to a change in soil moisture, either amount or timing, may be affected by increased CO 2. The list of potentially sensitive processes includes soil evaporation, run‐off, decomposition, and physiological adjustments of plants, as well as factors such as canopy development and the composition of the plant and microbial communities. Experimental evidence concerning ecosystem‐scale consequences of the effects of CO 2 on water use is only beginning to accumulate, but the initial indication is that, in water‐limited areas, the effects of CO 2‐induced changes in leaf conductance are comparable in importance to those of CO,2‐induced changes in photosynthesis. Above the leaf scale, a number of processes interact to modulate the response of canopy or regional evapotran‐spiration to increased CO 2. While some components of these processes tend to amplify the sensitivity of evapo‐transpiration to altered leaf conductance, the most likely overall pattern is one in which the responses of canopy and regional evapotranspiration are substantially smaller than the responses of canopy conductance. The effects of increased CO 2 on canopy evapotranspiration are likely to be smallest in aerodynamically smooth canopies with high leaf conductances. Under these circumstances, which are largely restricted to agriculture, decreases in evapotranspiration may be only one‐fourth as large as decreases in canopy conductance. Decreased canopy conductances over large regions may lead to altered climate, including increased temperature and decreased precipitation. The simulation experiments to date predict small effects globally, but these could be important regionally, especially in combination with radiative (greenhouse) effects of increased CO 2.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00630.x

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Cited by

See all 774

Metadata

Authors
FIELD, C. B., JACKSON, R. B., & MOONEY, H. A.
Venue
Plant, Cell & Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-10
Volume
18
Issue
10
Pages
1214-1225
ISSN
  • 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3040
OpenAlex
W2158784428
Cited by
774
References
59
FWCI
24.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stomatal responses to increased CO2: implications from the plant to the global scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00630.x
The paper
FIELD, C. B., JACKSON, R. B., & MOONEY, H. A. (1995). Stomatal responses to increased CO2: implications from the plant to the global scale. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00630.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.