The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Crop responses to ozone: uptake, modes of action, carbon assimilation and partitioning
Abstract
The inhibitory effects of tropospheric O 3 on crop photosynthesis, growth, and yield have been documented in numerous studies over the past 35 years. In large part, the results of this research supported governmental regulations designed to limit tropospheric O 3 levels to concentrations that affected crop production at economically acceptable levels. Recent studies have brought into question the efficacy of these concentration‐based O 3 standards compared with flux‐based approaches that incorporate O 3 uptake along with environmental and biotic factors that influence plant responses. In addition, recent studies provide insight into the biochemical mechanisms of O 3 injury to plants. Current interpretations suggest that upon entry into the leaf intercellular space O 3 rapidly reacts with components of the leaf apoplast to initiate a complex set of responses involving the formation of toxic metabolites and generation of plant defence responses that constitute variably effective countermeasures. Plant species and cultivars exhibit a range of sensitivity to O 3, evident as heritable characteristics, that must reflect identifiable biochemical and molecular processes that affect sensitivity to O 3 injury, although their exact makeup remains unclear. Ozone clearly impairs photosynthetic processes, which might include the effects on electron transport and guard cell homeostasis as well as the better‐documented effects on carbon fixation via decreased Rubisco activity. Translocation of photosynthate could be inhibited by O 3 exposure as well. Further, the influence of tropospheric O 3 needs to be considered when assessing potential effects of rising concentrations of atmospheric CO 2 on crop production. Advances in O 3 flux modelling and improved understanding of biochemical and molecular effects of O 3 on photosynthetic gas exchange and plant defence processes are leading to more complete, integrated assessments of O 3 impacts on crop physiology that continue to support the rationale for maintaining or improving current O 3 air quality standards as well as providing a basis for development of more O 3‐tolerant crop lines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. B
Press, H. (1886) · Cited by 10,080
Griggs, D. J., & Noguer, M. (2002) · Weather · doi:10.1256/004316502320517344 · Cited by 5,754
ASCORBATE AND GLUTATHIONE: Keeping Active Oxygen Under Control
Noctor, G., & Foyer, C. H. (1998) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.249 · Cited by 5,698
Jarvis, P. G. (1976) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1976.0035 · Cited by 3,260
Calcium channels activated by hydrogen peroxide mediate abscisic acid signalling in guard cells
Pei, Z.-M., Murata, Y., Benning, G., Thomine, S., Klüsener, B., Allen, G. J., Grill, E., & Schroeder, J. I. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35021067 · Cited by 2,109
FOYER, C. H., & NOCTOR, G. (2005) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01327.x · Cited by 1,887
RISING ATMOSPHERIC CARBON DIOXIDE: Plants FACE the Future
Long, S. P., Ainsworth, E. A., Rogers, A., & Ort, D. R. (2004) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141610 · Cited by 1,715
Loreto, F., & Velikova, V. (2001) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.010497 · Cited by 1,345
G UARD C ELL S IGNAL T RANSDUCTION
Schroeder, J. I., Allen, G. J., Hugouvieux, V., Kwak, J. M., & Waner, D. (2001) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.627 · Cited by 1,153
Photoinhibition of photosynthesis : from molecular mechanisms to the field
Baker, N. R., & Bowyer, J. R. (1994) · Cited by 1,029
Cited by
Source-to-sink transport of sugar and regulation by environmental factors
Lemoine, R., Camera, S. L., Atanassova, R., Dédaldéchamp, F., Allario, T., Pourtau, N., Bonnemain, J.-L., Laloi, M., Coutos-Thévenot, P., Maurousset, L., et al. (2013) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00272 · Cited by 1,236
The Effects of Tropospheric Ozone on Net Primary Productivity and Implications for Climate Change
Ainsworth, E. A., Yendrek, C. R., Sitch, S., Collins, W. J., & Emberson, L. D. (2012) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103829 · Cited by 887
Atmospheric composition change – global and regional air quality
Monks, P. S., Granier, C., Fuzzi, S., Stohl, A., Williams, M. L., Akimoto, H., Amann, M., Baklanov, A., Baltensperger, U., Bey, I., et al. (2009) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.08.021 · Cited by 872
Drought, ozone, ABA and ethylene: new insights from cell to plant to community
WILKINSON, S., & DAVIES, W. J. (2010) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02052.x · Cited by 730
FENG, Z., KOBAYASHI, K., & AINSWORTH, E. A. (2008) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01673.x · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- FISCUS, E. L., BOOKER, F. L., & BURKEY, K. O.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-04-19
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 997-1011
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2130020728
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 22.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crop responses to ozone: uptake, modes of action, carbon assimilation and partitioning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01349.x
- The paper
- FISCUS, E. L., BOOKER, F. L., & BURKEY, K. O. (2005). Crop responses to ozone: uptake, modes of action, carbon assimilation and partitioning. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01349.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.