Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 437

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of elevated ozone concentration on growth, physiology, and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): a meta‐analysis

FENG, ZHAOZHONG, KOBAYASHI, KAZUHIKO, AINSWORTH, ELIZABETH A.·2008·Global Change Biology

Abstract

We quantitatively evaluated the effects of elevated concentration of ozone (O 3) on growth, leaf chemistry, gas exchange, grain yield, and grain quality relative to carbon‐filtered air (CF) by means of meta‐analysis of published data. Our database consisted of 53 peer‐reviewed studies published between 1980 and 2007, taking into account wheat type, O 3 fumigation method, rooting environment, O 3 concentration ([O 3]), developmental stage, and additional treatments such as drought and elevated carbon dioxide concentration ([CO 2]). The results suggested that elevated [O 3] decreased wheat grain yield by 29% (CI: 24–34%) and aboveground biomass by 18% (CI: 13–24%), where CI is the 95% confidence interval. Even in studies where the [O 3] range was between 31 and 59 ppb (average 43 ppb), there was a significant decrease in the grain yield (18%) and biomass (16%) relative to CF. Despite the increase in the grain protein content (6.8%), elevated [O 3] significantly decreased the grain protein yield (−18%). Relative to CF, elevated [O 3] significantly decreased photosynthetic rates (−20%), Rubisco activity (−19%), stomatal conductance (−22%), and chlorophyll content (−40%). For the whole plant, rising [O 3] induced a larger decrease in belowground (−27%) biomass than in aboveground (−18%) biomass. There was no significant response difference between spring wheat and winter wheat. Wheat grown in the field showed larger decreases in leaf photosynthesis parameters than wheat grown in < 5 L pots. Open‐top chamber fumigation induced a larger reduction than indoor growth chambers, when plants were exposed to elevated [O 3]. The detrimental effect was progressively greater as the average daily [O 3] increased, with very few exceptions. The impact of O 3 increased with developmental stages, with the largest detrimental impact during grain filling. Both drought and elevated [CO 2] significantly ameliorated the detrimental effects of elevated [O 3], which could be explained by a significant decrease in O 3 uptake resulting from decreased stomatal conductance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01673.x

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Cited by

See all 437

Metadata

Authors
FENG, Z., KOBAYASHI, K., & AINSWORTH, E. A.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-10-22
Volume
14
Issue
11
Pages
2696-2708
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2051425552
Cited by
437
References
45
FWCI
15.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of elevated ozone concentration on growth, physiology, and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): a meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01673.x
The paper
FENG, Z., KOBAYASHI, K., & AINSWORTH, E. A. (2008). Impact of elevated ozone concentration on growth, physiology, and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): a meta‐analysis. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01673.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.