The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Involution of the Ageing Human Thymic Epithelium is Independent of Puberty: A Morphometric Study
Abstract
One hundred and thiriy‐six thymuses completely removed; il autopsy from persons suffering a sudden death were examined by stereological and morphomelrical meihods. Adding biopsy material from immunologically healthy cardiac patients we obtained relative volumes from 204 persons ranging in age from 1 month to 107 years. The size of the human thymus remains unchanged during ageing under normal physiological conditions (median: 19.5cm 3). Individual maximum size (range: 5‐70 cm 3) is reached in the first year of life. Early histological changes are in the enlargement of the peri vascular space, the Hassall's hodies, and the connective tissue. This begins in the first year of life, reaches a maximum from 10 to 25 years, then declines again. Adipose tissue replaces the lymphocytic pcrivascular space and the connective tissue only. This occurs extensively after the age of 15 years. When defined by the silver impregnation technique, the volumes of the thymic epithelium (cortex and medulla), show a continuous involution from the first year to the end of life. The curve can be approximated to simple negative logarithmic functions The velocity and nature of involution of the thymic epithelium do not change under the influence of the changing hormonal balance due to puberty. Since important thymic functions (T lymphopoiesis and T‐cell differentiation are located in the epithelial space. Ihe age‐related involution of the human thymlis is not related to puberty.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis
Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441 · Cited by 13,912
Admission criteria for immunogerontological studies in man: The senieur protocol
Ligthart, G. J., Corberand, J. X., Fournier, C., Galanaud, P., Hijmans, W., Kennes, B., Müller-Hermelink, H. K., & Steinmann, G. G. (1984) · Mechanisms of Ageing and Development · doi:10.1016/0047-6374(84)90152-0 · Cited by 754
Self-citation
Cited by
Accounting for cellular heterogeneity is critical in epigenome-wide association studies
Jaffe, A. E., & Irizarry, R. A. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r31 · Cited by 1,067
Estrogen deficiency and bone loss: an inflammatory tale
Weitzmann, M. N. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci28550 · Cited by 990
Immunosenescence: emerging challenges for an ageing population
Aw, D., Silva, A. B., & Palmer, D. B. (2007) · Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02555.x · Cited by 880
Understanding immunosenescence to improve responses to vaccines
Goronzy, J. J., & Weyand, C. M. (2013) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.2588 · Cited by 827
Gruver, A., Hudson, L., & Sempowski, G. (2007) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.2104 · Cited by 834
Metadata
- Authors
- STEINMANN, G. G., KLAUS, B., & MÜLLER‐HERMELINK, H. ‐.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Immunology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-11
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 563-575
- ISSN
- 0300-9475 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3083
- OpenAlex
- W2096584806
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.