Cited by 99Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisGeological and Geochemical Analysis

Palaeoproterozoic evaporites in Fennoscandia: implications for seawater sulphate, the rise of atmospheric oxygen and local amplification of the δ13C excursion

Melezhik, Victor A., Fallick, Anthony E., Rychanchik, Dmitry V., Kuznetsov, Anton B.·2005·Terra Nova

Abstract

This paper addresses global oxygenation and establishment of a marine sulphate reservoir in the Palaeoproterozoic. We report syn‐depositional, marine, anhydrite‐containing pseudomorphs after Ca‐sulphates as widespread throughout the Tulomozero Formation in the SE Fennoscandian Shield, implying that surface waters were oxidized and a large SO marine reservoir was developed as early as 2100 Ma. The Ca‐sulphates and associated magnesite and halite precipitated syn‐depositionally from oxidized, evolved and modified seawater in coastal playa, sabkha and intertidal flat settings. 87 Sr/86 Sr and δ 13 C of associated 13 C‐rich stromatolitic dolostones were environmentally controlled with the highest ratios occurring in playa and sabkha carbonates. The results imply that the Palaeoproterozoic δ 13 C carb excursion was amplified by 8‰ by local environmental factors and calls into question many observations of putative δ 13 C global signals reported previously from similar Palaeoproterozoic, evaporitic, dolostones. The local environmental amplification can explain a large regional and intercontinental δ 13 C discrepancy observed in synchronous carbonates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3121.2005.00600.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The oldest bedded sulfate evaporite deposits in Earth's rock record appear during this interval, in the Lucknow Formation in South Africa and the Tulomozero Formation in northwest Russia.

    “The oldest bedded sulfate evaporite deposits in Earth's rock record also appear during this interval, in the Lucknow Formation in South Africa (Schröder et al. 2008) and the Tulomozero Formation in northwest Russia (Melezhik et al. 2005).”

    From The History of Ocean Oxygenation (2022) · cites this paper as Melezhik et al. 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Melezhik, V. A., Fallick, A. E., Rychanchik, D. V., & Kuznetsov, A. B.
Affiliations
  • Geological Survey of Norway (NO)
  • Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Melezhik, Victor A.
Venue
Terra Nova
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-04
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
141-148
ISSN
  • 0954-4879 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3121
OpenAlex
W1502457072
Cited by
99
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Terra Nova (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Keywords
atmospheric oxygenation, sulfate reduction, δ13C excursion, calcium sulfate, magnesite, halite, strontium isotopes, Baltic Shield

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review