Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 234

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development and evaluation of an Arabidopsis whole genome Affymetrix probe array

Open access
Redman, Julia C., Haas, Brian J., Tanimoto, Gene, Town, Christopher D.·2004·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: We describe the development of a high‐density Arabidopsis‘whole genome’ oligonucleotide probe array for expression analysis (the Affymetrix ATH1 GeneChip® probe array) that contains approximately 22 750 probe sets. Precedence on the array was given to genes for which either expression evidence or a credible database match existed. The remaining space was filled with ‘hypothetical’ genes. The new ATH1 array represents approximately 23 750 genes of which 60% were detected in RNA from cultured seedlings. Sensitivity of the array, determined using spiking controls, was approximately one transcript per cell. The array demonstrated high technical reproducibility and concordance with real‐time PCR results. Indole‐3 acetic acid (IAA)‐induced changes in gene expression were used for biological validation of the array. A total of 222 genes were significantly upregulated and 103 significantly downregulated by exposure to IAA. Of the genes whose products could be functionally classified, the largest specific classes of upregulated genes were transcriptional regulators and protein kinases, many fewer of which were represented among the downregulated genes. Over one‐third of the auxin‐regulated genes have no known function, although many belong to gene families with members that have previously been shown to be auxin regulated. For the 6714 genes represented both on this and the earlier Arabidopsis Genome (AG) array, both signal intensities and gene expression ratios were very similar. Mapping of the oligonucleotides on the ATH1 array to the latest (version 4.0) annotation showed that over 95% of the probe sets (based on version 2.0 annotation) still fully represented their original target genes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02061.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 234

Metadata

Authors
Redman, J. C., Haas, B. J., Tanimoto, G., & Town, C. D.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-04-14
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
545-561
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W1982335518
Cited by
234
References
3
FWCI
10.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and evaluation of an Arabidopsis whole genome Affymetrix probe array. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02061.x
The paper
Redman, J. C., Haas, B. J., Tanimoto, G., & Town, C. D. (2004). Development and evaluation of an Arabidopsis whole genome Affymetrix probe array. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02061.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.