Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Light induces phenylpropanoid metabolism in Arabidopsis roots

Hemm, Matthew R., Rider, Stanley D., Ogas, Joseph, Murry, Daryl J., Chapple, Clint·2004·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: Experiments have shown that many phenylpropanoid genes are highly expressed in light‐grown Arabidopsis roots. Studies employing reporter gene constructs have indicated that the expression of these genes is localized not only to the lignifying root vasculature, but also to non‐lignifying tissues, such as the root cortex, suggesting that the proteins encoded by these genes may be involved in aspects of phenylpropanoid metabolism other than lignification. Consistent with this hypothesis, roots of etiolated and soil‐grown plants contain almost no soluble phenylpropanoids, but exposure to light leads to the accumulation of flavonoids, as well as high levels of coniferin and syringin (coniferyl and sinapyl‐4‐O‐glycosides), compounds not previously reported to be accumulated in Arabidopsis. To elucidate the mechanism by which light induces root secondary metabolism, extracts of mutants defective in light perception and light responses were analyzed for phenylpropanoid content. The results of these assays showed that phytochrome (PHY)B and cryptochrome (CRY)2 are the primary photoreceptors involved in light‐dependent phenylpropanoid accumulation, and that the hypocotyl elongated (HY5) transcription factor is also required for this response. The presence of phenylpropanoids in etiolated roots of cop (constitutively photomorphogenic)1, cop9, and det (de‐etiolated)1 mutants indicate that the corresponding wild‐type genes are required to repress root phenylpropanoid biosynthesis in the absence of light. Biochemical analysis of root cell walls and analysis of phenylpropanoid gene expression suggest that coniferin and syringin accumulation may be the result of both increased biosynthesis and decreased conversion of these compounds into other phenylpropanoid end products. Finally, our data suggest that the accumulation of coniferin, syringin, and flavonoids in Arabidopsis roots is a high‐irradiance response (HIR), and suggest that comparative analysis of light‐ and dark‐grown Arabidopsis roots may provide new insights into both phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and light signaling in plants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02089.x

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

See all 275

Metadata

Authors
Hemm, M. R., Rider, S. D., Ogas, J., Murry, D. J., & Chapple, C.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-05-04
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
765-778
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W1965879701
Cited by
275
References
53
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Light induces phenylpropanoid metabolism in Arabidopsis roots. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02089.x
The paper
Hemm, M. R., Rider, S. D., Ogas, J., Murry, D. J., & Chapple, C. (2004). Light induces phenylpropanoid metabolism in Arabidopsis roots. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02089.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.