Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 790

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Applications and advantages of virus‐induced gene silencing for gene function studies in plants

Open access
Burch‐Smith, Tessa M., Anderson, Jeffrey C., Martin, Gregory B., Dinesh‐Kumar, S. P.·2004·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: Virus‐induced gene silencing (VIGS) is a recently developed gene transcript suppression technique for characterizing the function of plant genes. The approach involves cloning a short sequence of a targeted plant gene into a viral delivery vector. The vector is used to infect a young plant, and in a few weeks natural defense mechanisms of the plant directed at suppressing virus replication also result in specific degradation of mRNAs from the endogenous plant gene that is targeted for silencing. VIGS is rapid (3–4 weeks from infection to silencing), does not require development of stable transformants, allows characterization of phenotypes that might be lethal in stable lines, and offers the potential to silence either individual or multiple members of a gene family. Here we briefly review the discoveries that led to the development of VIGS and what is known about the experimental requirements for effective silencing. We describe the methodology of VIGS and how it can be optimized and used for both forward and reverse genetics studies. Advantages and disadvantages of VIGS compared with other loss‐of‐function approaches available for plants are discussed, along with how the limitations of VIGS might be overcome. Examples are reviewed where VIGS has been used to provide important new insights into the roles of specific genes in plant development and plant defense responses. Finally, we examine the future prospects for VIGS as a powerful tool for assessing and characterizing the function of plant genes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02158.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 790

Metadata

Authors
Burch‐Smith, T. M., Anderson, J. C., Martin, G. B., & Dinesh‐Kumar, S. P.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-08-16
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
734-746
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W2022187444
Cited by
790
References
3
FWCI
35.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Applications and advantages of virus‐induced gene silencing for gene function studies in plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02158.x
The paper
Burch‐Smith, T. M., Anderson, J. C., Martin, G. B., & Dinesh‐Kumar, S. P. (2004). Applications and advantages of virus‐induced gene silencing for gene function studies in plants. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02158.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.