The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High‐frequency homologous recombination in plants mediated by zinc‐finger nucleases
Abstract
Summary: Homologous recombination offers great promise for plant genome engineering. This promise has not been realized, however, because when DNA enters plant cells homologous recombination occurs infrequently and random integration predominates. Using a tobacco test system, we demonstrate that chromosome breaks created by zinc‐finger nucleases greatly enhance the frequency of localized recombination. Homologous recombination was measured by restoring function to a defective GUS:NPTII reporter gene integrated at various chromosomal sites in 10 different transgenic tobacco lines. The reporter gene carried a recognition site for a zinc‐finger nuclease, and protoplasts from each tobacco line were electroporated with both DNA encoding the nuclease and donor DNA to effect repair of the reporter. Homologous recombination occurred in more than 10% of the transformed protoplasts regardless of the reporter's chromosomal position. Approximately 20% of the GUS:NPTII reporter genes were repaired solely by homologous recombination, whereas the remainder had associated DNA insertions or deletions consistent with repair by both homologous recombination and non‐homologous end joining. The DNA‐binding domain encoded by zinc‐finger nucleases can be engineered to recognize a variety of chromosomal target sequences. This flexibility, coupled with the enhancement in homologous recombination conferred by double‐strand breaks, suggests that plant genome engineering through homologous recombination can now be reliably accomplished using zinc‐finger nucleases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chimeric nucleases stimulate gene targeting in human cells
Porteus, M. H., & Baltimore, D. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1078395 · Cited by 741
Cited by
Genome Engineering With Zinc-Finger Nucleases
Carroll, D. (2011) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.111.131433 · Cited by 1,076
An improved zinc-finger nuclease architecture for highly specific genome editing
Miller, J. C., Holmes, M. C., Wang, J., Guschin, D. Y., Lee, Y.-L., Rupniewski, I., Beausejour, C. M., Waite, A. J., Wang, N. S., Kim, K. A., et al. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1319 · Cited by 1,051
Applications of CRISPR–Cas in agriculture and plant biotechnology
Zhu, H., Li, C., & Gao, C. (2020) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-020-00288-9 · Cited by 870
Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases Enable Efficient Plant Genome Engineering
Zhang, Y., Zhang, F., Li, X., Baller, J. A., Qi, Y., Starker, C. G., Bogdanove, A. J., & Voytas, D. F. (2012) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.112.205179 · Cited by 486
Self-citationTargeted genome editing in human cells with zinc finger nucleases constructed via modular assembly
Kim, H. J., Lee, H. J., Kim, H., Cho, S. W., & Kim, J.-S. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.089417.108 · Cited by 466
Metadata
- Authors
- Wright, D. A., Townsend, J. A., Winfrey, R. J., Irwin, P. A., Rajagopal, J., Lonosky, P. M., Hall, B. D., Jondle, M. D., & Voytas, D. F.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-10-18
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 693-705
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2133872029
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High‐frequency homologous recombination in plants mediated by zinc‐finger nucleases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2005.02551.x
- The paper
- Wright, D. A., Townsend, J. A., Winfrey, R. J., Irwin, P. A., Rajagopal, J., Lonosky, P. M., Hall, B. D., Jondle, M. D., & Voytas, D. F. (2005). High‐frequency homologous recombination in plants mediated by zinc‐finger nucleases. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2005.02551.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.