The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gateway‐compatible vectors for plant functional genomics and proteomics
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Gateway cloning technology facilitates high‐throughput cloning of target sequences by making use of the bacteriophage lambda site‐specific recombination system. Target sequences are first captured in a commercially available ‘entry vector’ and are then recombined into various ‘destination vectors’ for expression in different experimental organisms. Gateway technology has been embraced by a number of plant laboratories that have engineered destination vectors for promoter specificity analyses, protein localization studies, protein/protein interaction studies, constitutive or inducible protein expression studies, gene knockdown by RNA interference, or affinity purification experiments. We review the various types of Gateway destination vectors that are currently available to the plant research community and provide links and references to enable additional information to be obtained concerning these vectors. We also describe a set of ‘pEarleyGate’ plasmid vectors for Agrobacterium‐mediated plant transformation that translationally fuse FLAG, HA, cMyc, AcV5 or tandem affinity purification epitope tags onto target proteins, with or without an adjacent fluorescent protein. The oligopeptide epitope tags allow the affinity purification, immunolocalization or immunoprecipitation of recombinant proteins expressed in vivo. We demonstrate the utility of pEarleyGate destination vectors for the expression of epitope‐tagged proteins that can be affinity captured or localized by immunofluorescence microscopy. Antibodies detecting the FLAG, HA, cMyc and AcV5 tags show relatively little cross‐reaction with endogenous proteins in a variety of monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants, suggesting broad utility for the tags and vectors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bradford, M. M. (1976) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 · Cited by 255,302
Cited by
Nakagawa, T., Kurose, T., Hino, T., Tanaka, K., Kawamukai, M., Niwa, Y., Toyooka, K., Matsuoka, K., Jinbo, T., & Kimura, T. (2007) · Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering · doi:10.1263/jbb.104.34 · Cited by 1,643
A CRISPR/Cas9 Toolbox for Multiplexed Plant Genome Editing and Transcriptional Regulation
Lowder, L. G., Zhang, D., Baltes, N. J., Paul, J. W., Tang, X., Zheng, X., Voytas, D. F., Hsieh, T.-F., Zhang, Y., & Qi, Y. (2015) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.15.00636 · Cited by 707
Du, J., Zhong, X., Bernatavichute, Y. V., Stroud, H., Feng, S., Caro, E., Vashisht, A. A., Terragni, J., Chin, H. G., Tu, A., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.034 · Cited by 555
Bassil, E., Tajima, H., Liang, Y.-C., Ohto, M.-A., Ushijima, K., Nakano, R., Esumi, T., Coku, A., Belmonte, M., & Blumwald, E. (2011) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.111.089581 · Cited by 470
Receptor-mediated exopolysaccharide perception controls bacterial infection
Kawaharada, Y., Kelly, S., Nielsen, M. W., Hjuler, C. T., Gysel, K., Muszyński, A., Carlson, R. W., Thygesen, M. B., Sandal, N., Asmussen, M. H., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14611 · Cited by 441
Metadata
- Authors
- Earley, K. W., Haag, J. R., Pontes, O., Opper, K., Juehne, T., Song, K., & Pikaard, C. S.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-01-26
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 616-629
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2141429272
- Cited by
- 1,790
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gateway‐compatible vectors for plant functional genomics and proteomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2005.02617.x
- The paper
- Earley, K. W., Haag, J. R., Pontes, O., Opper, K., Juehne, T., Song, K., & Pikaard, C. S. (2006). Gateway‐compatible vectors for plant functional genomics and proteomics. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2005.02617.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.