The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Arabidopsis myrosinases TGG1 and TGG2 have redundant function in glucosinolate breakdown and insect defense
Open accessAbstract
Summary: In Arabidopsis and other Brassicaceae, the enzyme myrosinase (β‐thioglucoside glucohydrolase, TGG) degrades glucosinolates to produce toxins that deter herbivory. A broadly applicable selection for meiotic recombination between tightly linked T‐DNA insertions was developed to generate Arabidopsis tgg1tgg2 double mutants and study myrosinase function. Glucosinolate breakdown in crushed leaves of tgg1 or tgg2 single mutants was comparable to that of wild‐type, indicating redundant enzyme function. In contrast, leaf extracts of tgg1tgg2 double mutants had undetectable myrosinase activity in vitro, and damage‐induced breakdown of endogenous glucosinolates was apparently absent for aliphatic and greatly slowed for indole glucosinolates. Maturing leaves of myrosinase mutants had significantly increased glucosinolate levels. However, developmental decreases in glucosinolate content during senescence and germination were unaffected, showing that these processes occur independently of TGG1 and TGG2. Insect herbivores with different host plant preferences and feeding styles varied in their responses to myrosinase mutations. Weight gain of two Lepidoptera, the generalist Trichoplusia ni and the facultative Solanaceae‐specialist Manduca sexta, was significantly increased on tgg1tgg2 double mutants. Two crucifer‐specialist Lepidoptera had differing responses. Whereas Plutella xylostella was unaffected by myrosinase mutations, Pieris rapae performed better on wild‐type, perhaps due to reduced feeding stimulants in tgg1tgg2 mutants. Reproduction of two Homoptera, Myzus persicae and Brevicoryne brassicae, was unaffected by myrosinase mutations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bridges, M., Jones, A. M. E., Bones, A. M., Hodgson, C., Cole, R., Bartlet, E., Wallsgrove, R., Karapapa, V. K., Watts, N., & Rossiter, J. T. (2002) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1861 · Cited by 186
The chemical world of crucivores: lures, treats and traps
Renwick, J. A. A. (2002) · Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata · doi:10.1046/j.1570-7458.2002.00988.x · Cited by 170
Cited by
Glucosinolate Metabolites Required for an Arabidopsis Innate Immune Response
Clay, N. K., Adio, A. M., Denoux, C., Jander, G., & Ausubel, F. M. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1164627 · Cited by 1,098
Self-citationPlant–arthropod interactions: who is the winner?
Stahl, E., Hilfiker, O., & Reymond, P. (2018) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.13773 · Cited by 164
Katz, E., Nisani, S., Yadav, B. S., Woldemariam, M. G., Shai, B., Obolski, U., Ehrlich, M., Shani, E., Jander, G., & Chamovitz, D. A. (2015) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12824 · Cited by 118
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Barth, C., & Jander, G.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-04-04
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 549-562
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2160649396
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 29.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arabidopsis myrosinases TGG1 and TGG2 have redundant function in glucosinolate breakdown and insect defense. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02716.x
- The paper
- Barth, C., & Jander, G. (2006). Arabidopsis myrosinases TGG1 and TGG2 have redundant function in glucosinolate breakdown and insect defense. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02716.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.