The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interplay between MAMP‐triggered and SA‐mediated defense responses
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Plants respond to pathogen infection using an innate immune system with at least two distinct recognition mechanisms. One mechanism recognizes microbe‐associated molecular patterns (MAMPs). The other is based on resistance (R) genes and specifically recognizes certain pathogen virulence factors, including those delivered through the type III secretion system (TTSS) of bacteria. Salicylic acid (SA)‐mediated responses are an important part of the R gene‐mediated defense. Substantial overlaps between MAMP‐triggered and SA‐mediated responses have been reported. However, interactions between MAMP‐triggered and SA‐mediated signaling mechanisms have not been well documented. Here we report intimate interactions between MAMP‐triggered and SA‐mediated signaling. We found that SA accumulated at a higher level 6 h after treatment with a MAMP, flg22 or inoculation with Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pst DC3000) hrcC mutant, which is deficient in TTSS function. Disruptions of SA signaling components, such as SID2 and PAD4, strongly affected MAMP‐triggered responses monitored by expression profiling. We found two groups of genes that were induced by Pst DC3000 hrcC in an SA‐dependent manner. One group was SID2‐dependent at all time points, whereas the other was SID2‐independent at early time points and SID2‐dependent at later time points. Thus, the expression of the latter genes responds to MAMPs through both SA‐independent and SA‐dependent signaling mechanisms. Strong resistance to Pst DC3000 hrcC was dependent on SA signaling. These results indicate that the SA increase triggered by MAMPs is a major component of the MAMP‐triggered signaling mechanism, explaining the overlapping spectra of MAMP‐triggered and SA‐mediated responses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns
Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863 · Cited by 16,184
Host-Microbe Interactions: Shaping the Evolution of the Plant Immune Response
Chisholm, S. T., Coaker, G., Day, B., & Staskawicz, B. J. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.008 · Cited by 2,957
Cited by
Systemic Acquired Resistance (50 Years after Discovery): Moving from the Lab to the Field
Gozzo, F., & Faoro, F. (2013) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf404156x · Cited by 201
De Vleesschauwer, D., Chernin, L., & Höfte, M. M. (2009) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2229-9-9 · Cited by 77
The role of nitric oxide-induced atill6 in growth and disease resistance in arabidopsis thaliana
Khan, M., Al Azawi, T. N. I., Pande, A., Mun, B.-G., Lee, D.-S., Hussain, A., Lee, B.-H., & Yun, B.-W. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.685156 · Cited by 61
(2026) · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2026.111274 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsuda, K., Sato, M., Glazebrook, J., Cohen, J. D., & Katagiri, F.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-11-14
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 763-775
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2102425597
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interplay between MAMP‐triggered and SA‐mediated defense responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03369.x
- The paper
- Tsuda, K., Sato, M., Glazebrook, J., Cohen, J. D., & Katagiri, F. (2008). Interplay between MAMP‐triggered and SA‐mediated defense responses. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03369.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.