The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The plant innate immunity response in stomatal guard cells invokes G‐protein‐dependent ion channel regulation
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Stomata in the epidermis of terrestrial plants are important for CO 2 absorption and transpirational water loss, and are also potential points of entry for pathogens. Stomatal opening and closure are controlled by distinct mechanisms. Arabidopsis stomata have been shown to close in response to bacteria and pathogen‐associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) as part of PAMP‐triggered immunity (PTI). Here we show that flg22, a PAMP derived from bacterial flagellin, also inhibits light‐induced stomatal opening. Consistent with our observations on stomatal opening, flg22 inhibits the inward K+ channels (K+in currents) of guard cells that mediate K+ uptake during stomatal opening. Similar to previously documented K+ current changes triggered by exogenous elevation of H 2 O 2 and nitric oxide (NO), with prolonged duration of flg22 exposure the outward K+ channels (K+out currents) of guard cells are also inhibited. In null mutants of the flg22 receptor, FLS2, flg22 regulation of stomatal opening, K+in currents, and K+out currents is eliminated. flg22 also fails to elicit these responses in null mutants of the sole canonical G‐protein α subunit, GPA1. The bacterial toxin, coronatine, produced by several pathogenic strains of Pseudomonas syringae, reverses the inhibitory effects of flg22 on both K+in currents and stomatal opening, indicating interplay between plant and pathogen in the regulation of plant ion channels. Thus, the PAMP‐triggered stomatal response involves K+ channel regulation, and this regulation is dependent on signaling via cognate PAMP receptors and a heterotrimeric G‐protein. These new findings provide insights into the largely elusive signaling process underlying PTI‐associated guard cell responses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jones, J. D. G., & Dangl, J. L. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05286 · Cited by 13,177
Host-Microbe Interactions: Shaping the Evolution of the Plant Immune Response
Chisholm, S. T., Coaker, G., Day, B., & Staskawicz, B. J. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.008 · Cited by 2,957
Cited by
Transmission of Bacterial Endophytes
Frank, A., Saldierna Guzmán, J., & Shay, J. (2017) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms5040070 · Cited by 478
Stomatal Defense a Decade Later
Melotto, M., Zhang, L., Oblessuc, P. R., & He, S. Y. (2017) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.16.01853 · Cited by 339
Self-citationPlant innate immunity: An updated insight into defense mechanism
Muthamilarasan, M., & Prasad, M. (2013) · Journal of Biosciences · doi:10.1007/s12038-013-9302-2 · Cited by 309
RIN4 Functions with Plasma Membrane H+-ATPases to Regulate Stomatal Apertures during Pathogen Attack
Liu, J., Elmore, J. M., Fuglsang, A. T., Palmgren, M. G., Staskawicz, B. J., & Coaker, G. (2009) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000139 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, W., He, S. Y., & Assmann, S. M.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 984-996
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W1996637616
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The plant innate immunity response in stomatal guard cells invokes G‐protein‐dependent ion channel regulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03657.x
- The paper
- Zhang, W., He, S. Y., & Assmann, S. M. (2008). The plant innate immunity response in stomatal guard cells invokes G‐protein‐dependent ion channel regulation. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03657.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.