Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 422

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interplay between calcium signalling and early signalling elements during defence responses to microbe‐ or damage‐associated molecular patterns

Open access
Ranf, Stefanie, Eschen‐Lippold, Lennart, Pecher, Pascal, Lee, Justin, Scheel, Dierk·2011·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: While diverse microbe‐ or damage‐associated molecular patterns (MAMPs/DAMPs) typically trigger a common set of intracellular signalling events, comparative analysis between the MAMPs flg22 and elf18 revealed MAMP‐specific differences in Ca 2+ signalling, defence gene expression and MAMP‐mediated growth arrest in Arabidopsis thaliana. Such MAMP‐specific differences are, in part, controlled by BAK1, a kinase associated with several receptors. Whereas defence gene expression and growth inhibition mediated by flg22 were reduced in bak1 mutants, BAK1 had no or minor effects on the same responses elicited by elf18. As the residual Ca 2+ elevations induced by diverse MAMPs/DAMPs (flg22, elf18 and Pep1) were virtually identical in bak1 mutants, a differential BAK1‐mediated signal amplification to attain MAMP/DAMP‐specific Ca 2+ amplitudes in wild‐type plants may be hypothesized. Furthermore, abrogation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation, either in the rbohD mutant or through inhibitor application, led to loss of a second Ca 2+ peak, demonstrating a feedback effect of ROS on Ca 2+ signalling. Conversely, mpk3 mutants showed a prolonged accumulation of ROS but this did not significantly impinge on the overall Ca 2+ response. Thus, fine‐tuning of MAMP/DAMP responses involves interplay between diverse signalling elements functioning both up‐ or downstream of Ca 2+ signalling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04671.x

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Cited by

See all 422

Metadata

Authors
Ranf, S., Eschen‐Lippold, L., Pecher, P., Lee, J., & Scheel, D.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-07-14
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
100-113
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W1562567267
Cited by
422
References
63
FWCI
30.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interplay between calcium signalling and early signalling elements during defence responses to microbe‐ or damage‐associated molecular patterns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04671.x
The paper
Ranf, S., Eschen‐Lippold, L., Pecher, P., Lee, J., & Scheel, D. (2011). Interplay between calcium signalling and early signalling elements during defence responses to microbe‐ or damage‐associated molecular patterns. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04671.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.