Cited by 58Malaria Research and ControlGlobal Maternal and Child HealthHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders

Impact of a double dose of sulphadoxine–pyrimethamine to reduce prevalence of pregnancy malaria in southern Mozambique

Open access
Challis, K., Osman, N. B., Cotiro, M., Nordahl, G., Dgedge, M., Bergström, S.·2004·Tropical Medicine & International Health

Abstract

Summary: Malarial infection during pregnancy increases the risks of severe sequelae for the pregnant woman and the risk of delivering a low birthweight baby. The aim of this intervention study was to reduce significantly the prevalence of malaria parasitaemia in adolescent parturients in Matola and Boane in Mozambique. The study was focused upon the most malaria‐vulnerable group, adolescent nulliparous and primiparous women. After completing the usual antenatal clinic and giving informed consent, 600 pregnant women were randomly chosen in a double blind manner to one of two regimens comparing the prevailing routine (placebo) for malaria prevention with a two dose regimen of sulphadoxine–pyrimethamine (SP). The first dose was given at enrolment with a second dose at the beginning of the third trimester. At delivery maternal and placental malaria parasitaemia as well as birthweight and gestational duration were analysed. At booking the prevalence of malaria parasitaemia was 35.3% in the placebo group and 30.6% in the SP group. At the second dose, the prevalence of malaria parasitaemia in the placebo group and SP group was 19.7% and 8.7%, respectively. This implies a relative risk (RR) of 2.24 with 95% CI (1.34, 3.75). The corresponding figures at delivery were 13.6% and 6.3% with an RR of 2.22 (1.07, 4.60) and in placenta 13.3% and 2.4% with an RR of 4.87 (1.58, 15.0). Newborns with malaria within 7 days were significantly more frequent in the placebo group, 6.4% and 0.7% respectively, with an RR of 6.55 (1.20, 35.7). Almost all (approximately 98%) of the women studied had Plasmodium falciparum, the remainder had P. malariae and P. ovale. The mean birthweight in the SP group was 3077 g and in the placebo group 2926 g. The estimated mean difference between the two groups was 151 g with 95% CI (51, 252). The mean placental weight in the placebo group was 596 and 645 g in the SP group, implying a difference of 49 g with a 95% CI (11, 88). The mean gestational duration was 6.1 days longer in the SP group, 95% CI (1.5, 10.6). In the placebo group there were two cases of urticaria and one case of nausea; in the SP group there was one case of vomiting. No newborn showed any sign of serious SP side‐effect. Two doses of SP were enough to significantly reduce the prevalence of peripheral and placental malaria parasitaemia among young nulliparous and primiparous pregnant women in Matola and Boane.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01307.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In stable transmission settings, many trials have shown that SP given as IPTp is efficacious in preventing the adverse consequences of malaria during pregnancy.

    “In stable transmission settings, many trials have shown that SP given as IPTp is efficacious in preventing the adverse consequences of malaria during pregnancy (Table 3).100–104”

    From Malaria in pregnancy. (2013) · cites this paper as [104]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Challis, K., Osman, N. B., Cotiro, M., Nordahl, G., Dgedge, M., & Bergström, S.
Affiliations
  • Sundsvall Municipality (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Instituto Nacional de Saúde (MZ)
Corresponding author
  • Challis, K.
  • Osman, N. B.
  • Cotiro, M.
  • Nordahl, G.
  • Dgedge, M.
  • Bergström, S.
Venue
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-10
Volume
9
Issue
10
Pages
1066-1073
ISSN
  • 1360-2276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3156
OpenAlex
W2084206772
Cited by
58
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tropical Medicine & International Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Keywords
sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, Plasmodium falciparum, placental malaria, birth weight, low birth weight, neonatal malaria, Plasmodium malariae, Plasmodium ovale, prenatal care, southern Mozambique
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Antimalarials, Birth Weight, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Combinations, Female, Humans, Malaria, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prenatal Care, Pyrimethamine, Sulfadoxine, Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic, Parasitemia, Patient Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review