Cited by 31Malaria Research and ControlHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersBiosensors and Analytical Detection

Short communication: Comparison of the OptiMAL rapid test and microscopy for detection of malaria in pregnant women in Nigeria

Open access
VanderJagt, T. A., Ikeh, E. I., Ujah, I. O. A., Belmonte, J., Glew, R. H., VanderJagt, D. J.·2005·Tropical Medicine & International Health

Abstract

Summary: Malaria during pregnancy causes anaemia in pregnant women and low birthweight in infants. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the OptiMAL rapid malaria test in comparison with standard microscopy for malaria diagnosis in 268 pregnant women attending antenatal clinics at the Jos University Teaching Hospital and the Federal Medical Centre‐Gombe in Nigeria. Positive results by either method were confirmed using a polymerase chain reaction assay for malaria. Although the OptiMAL assay did not detect malaria in the blood of pregnant women with low levels of parasitaemia, it may be useful for the detection of placental malaria which predisposes to low birthweight infants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01349.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sensitivity of the OptiMAL test increases with parasite density.

    “The sensitivity of the OptiMAL test increases with parasite density.”

    From Diagnosing malaria in pregnancy: An update (2012) · cites this paper as [11]

  • In one study, all samples with parasite density below 100/μl were missed by OptiMAL.

    “In one study, all samples with parasite density of <100/μl were missed [11].”

    From Diagnosing malaria in pregnancy: An update (2012) · cites this paper as [11]

  • The OptiMAL test, based on pLDH detection, gave varying results between studies when compared with peripheral blood smears, with sensitivity ranging from 15 to 96.6% and specificity from 90.8 to 98%.

    “The OptiMAL test, based on the detection of pLDH, gave varying results between studies when compared with peripheral BS. The sensitivity ranged from 15 to 96.6% and specificity from 90.8 to 98% [10–12].”

    From Diagnosing malaria in pregnancy: An update (2012) · cites this paper as [11]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. I. O. A. Ujah, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jos University Teaching Hospital, PMB 2076, Jos, Nigeria. E-mail: iujah@uniceg.org Tropical Medicine and International Health volume 10 no 1 pp 39-41 january 2005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
VanderJagt, T. A., Ikeh, E. I., Ujah, I. O. A., Belmonte, J., Glew, R. H., & VanderJagt, D. J.
Affiliations
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • University of Jos (NG)
Corresponding author
  • VanderJagt, T. A.
  • Ikeh, E. I.
  • Ujah, I. O. A.
  • Belmonte, J.
  • Glew, R. H.
  • VanderJagt, D. J.
Venue
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
39-41
ISSN
  • 1360-2276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3156
OpenAlex
W2080948536
Cited by
31
References
5
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tropical Medicine & International Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Fogarty International Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
Keywords
malaria in pregnancy, rapid diagnostic tests, microscopy, placental malaria, low birth weight, parasitemia, prenatal care, Nigeria
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Antigens, Protozoan, Developing Countries, Female, Humans, Immunoassay, L-Lactate Dehydrogenase, Malaria, Microscopy, Nigeria, Plasmodium, Pregnancy, Reagent Strips, Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Parasitemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review