Cited by 77Malaria Research and ControlBiosensors and Analytical DetectionHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders

EVALUATION OF A MALARIA RAPID DIAGNOSTIC TEST FOR ASSESSING THE BURDEN OF MALARIA DURING PREGNANCY

SINGER, LAUREN M., NEWMAN, ROBERT D., DIARRA, AMIDOU, MORAN, ALLISYN C., HUBER, CURTIS S., STENNIES, GAIL, SIRIMA, SODIOMON B., KONATE, AMADOU +4 more·2004·The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

Abstract

Plasmodium falciparum infection during pregnancy may cause placental malaria and subsequently low birth weight, primarily through the placental sequestration of infected red blood cells. Measuring the burden of malaria during pregnancy usually involves determining the prevalence of placental malaria infection through microscopic examination of placental blood films, a difficult and error-prone process. A number of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria have been developed, most of them immunochromatographic dipstick assays. However, none have been tested for the direct determination of malaria antigen in placental blood. We undertook an evaluation of the Malaria Rapid Test (MAKROmed®) in determining placental malaria infection. The prevalence of placental parasitemia was 22.6% by microscopy, 51.0% by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and 43.1% by RDT. When the PCR was used as the gold standard, RDTs had a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 76%. The MAKROmed RDT was highly sensitive in the detection of placental malaria, but had lower than expected specificity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4269/ajtmh.2004.70.481

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When performed on peripheral blood for pregnancy malaria diagnosis, RDT-HRP2 sensitivity is more than 90% compared with peripheral blood smear and 80-95% compared with placental blood smear, with specificity between 61 and 94%.

    “When performed on peripheral blood samples for PM diagnoses, RDT-HRP2 sensitivity was more than 90% when compared with peripheral BS, and 80–95% when compared with placental BS, with specificity between 61 and 94% [13–16].”

    From Diagnosing malaria in pregnancy: An update (2012) · cites this paper as [15]

  • The sensitivity of RDT-HRP2 using peripheral blood is much lower when compared with PCR detection of parasite nucleic acids in peripheral or placental blood.

    “The sensitivity of RDT-HRP2 using peripheral blood samples was much lower when compared with PCR detection of parasite nucleic acids in peripheral or placental blood (Table 1)[15–17].”

    From Diagnosing malaria in pregnancy: An update (2012) · cites this paper as [15]

  • Compared to PCR performed on placental or peripheral blood, the sensitivity of RDT tests was low in two of three pregnancy malaria diagnostics studies.

    “Compared to PCR performed on placental or peripheral blood [14,15,17], the sensitivity of RDT tests was low in two of three PM diagnostics studies.”

    From Diagnosing malaria in pregnancy: An update (2012) · cites this paper as [15]

  • Whether applied to peripheral blood or placental blood samples, PCR methods yield positivity rates 20% or more above those of blood smear microscopy.

    “Whether applied to peripheral blood or placental blood samples, PCR methods yield positivity rates 20% or more above those of BS microscopy (Tables 3 & 4) [10,14–16,38–46].”

    From Diagnosing malaria in pregnancy: An update (2012) · cites this paper as [15]

  • Submicroscopic placental infection was associated with reduced birthweight in several studies.

    “Submicroscopic placental infection was associated with reduced birthweight in several studies [15,44,45].”

    From Diagnosing malaria in pregnancy: An update (2012) · cites this paper as [15]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SINGER, L. M., NEWMAN, R. D., DIARRA, A., MORAN, A. C., HUBER, C. S., STENNIES, G., SIRIMA, S. B., KONATE, A., YAMEOGO, M., SAWADOGO, R., BARNWELL, J. W., & PARISE, M. E.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Malaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; Centre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme, Ministére de la Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina, Faso; Maternal and Neonatal Health Program, JHPIEGO Corporation, Baltimore, Maryland; Sante Maternelle et Neonatale, Koupéla, Burkina Faso
Venue
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Published
2004-05
Volume
70
Issue
5
Pages
481-485
ISSN
0002-9637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171989251
Cited by
77
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Keywords
placental malaria, malaria in pregnancy, rapid diagnostic tests, Plasmodium falciparum, sensitivity and specificity, low birth weight, placental sequestration
MeSH terms
Birth Weight, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Microscopy, Placenta Diseases, Pregnancy, Sensitivity and Specificity, Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Malaria, Falciparum, Parasitemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review