A simple approach to test for interaction between intervention and an individual-level variable in community randomized trials
Abstract
Summary: Objective To develop a simple and robust approach for the test of interaction between community intervention and an individual‐level variable suitable for use in typical situations of community randomized trials (CRTs), i.e. small number of communities but large number of subjects per community. Methods We propose a method based on taking the difference between summary statistics from groups of individuals with and without an attribute within each community, then applying a two‐sample t‐test or Wilcoxon test to compare the distribution of within‐community differences between trial arms. The method is evaluated using simulations and illustrated using data from a CRT of a health education intervention. Approximate sample size formulas are derived. Results Analyses based on the t‐test give power very close to expected level in a variety of situations, including when the summary statistics are not symmetrically distributed across communities, the covariate is not distributed as planned, and the number of communities per intervention arm ranges from 8 to 20. Even in the situation with as few as four communities per arm, the power is only slightly lower than expected. Type I error rates always closely follow 5% as required, whether the distributional assumption is correct or not. The application of the Wilcoxon test appears too conservative. Conclusions The proposed approach to test for interaction is valid and easy to use. The application of the t‐test in this setting is robust.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Task shifting is increasingly advocated as a way to address shortages of specialist health human resources.
“Task shifting is an increasingly advocated method to address specialist health human resource shortages [27–28].”
Cites
Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials
Sonnad, S. S. (1999) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-199902000-00025 · Cited by 1,130 · see citing works
Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials
Murray, D. M. (2007) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195120363.001.0001 · Cited by 1,114 · see citing works
Biostatistics: A Methodology for the Health Sciences.
D’Agostino, R. B., Fisher, L. D., & van Belle, G. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291095 · Cited by 959 · see citing works
Simple sample size calculation for cluster-randomized trials
Hayes, R., & Bennett, S. (1999) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/28.2.319 · Cited by 824 · see citing works
Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent methodological developments
Murray, D. M., Varnell, S. P., & Blitstein, J. L. (2004) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.94.3.423 · Cited by 677 · see citing works
Mason, S. M., Knowles, E., Colwell, B., Dixon, S., Wardrope, J., Gorringe, R., Snooks, H. A., Perrin, J., & Nicholl, J. P. (2007) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39343.649097.55 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Biostatistics: a methodology for the health sciences
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-0993 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
ON DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS AND RANDOMIZATION-BASED INFERENCE FOR COMMUNITY INTERVENTION TRIALS
Gail, M. H., Mark, S. D., Carroll, R. J., Green, S. B., & Pee, D. (1996) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19960615)15:11 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Robustness of the two independent samplest‐test when applied to ordinal scaled data
Heeren, T., & D’Agostino, R. B. (1987) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780060110 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Chandramohan, D., Owusu‐Agyei, S., Carneiro, I. A., Awine, T., Amponsa-Achiano, K., Mensah, N. K., Jaffar, S. S., Baiden, R., Hodgson, A., Binka, F. N., et al. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7519.727 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Designing and analysing case-control studies to exploit independence of genotype and exposure
Umbach, D. M., & Weinberg, C. R. (1997) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970815)16:15 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Analysis of a trial randomised in clusters: Table 1
Kerry, S. M., & Bland, J. M. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7124.54 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Aspects of statistical design for the community intervention trial for smoking cessation (COMMIT)
Gail, M. H., Byar, D. P., Pechacek, T. F., & Corle, D. K. (1992) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(92)90026-v · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Selected Statistical Issues in Group Randomized Trials
Feng, Z., Diehr, P. H., Peterson, A. V., & McLerran, D. (2001) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.22.1.167 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Diehr, P. H., Martin, D. C., Koepsell, T. D., & Cheadle, A. D. (1995) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780141309 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Clinical trials: a practical guide to design, analysis and reporting
Sabin, C. A. (2006) · Clinical Medicine · doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.6-6-619a · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Clinical Trials - A Practical Guide to Design, Analysis, and Reporting
Wang, D., & Bakhai, A. (2006) · LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Methods for the analysis of incidence rates in cluster randomized trials
Bennett, S., Parpia, T., Hayes, R., & Cousens, S. N. (2002) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/31.4.839 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials
Zucker, D. M. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780203912881-5 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Peters, T., Richards, S. H., Bankhead, C. R., Ades, A. E., & Sterne, J. A. C. (2003) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyg228 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Marbiah, N. T., Petersen, E., David, K., et al. (1998) · American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · doi:10.4269/ajtmh.1998.58.1 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Analysis of messy longitudinal data from a randomized clinical trial
Qian, W., Parmar, M., Sambrook, R., Fayers, P. M., Girling, D. J., & Stephens, R. J. (2000) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/1097-0258(20001015)19:19 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Gülmezoglu, A. M., Villar, J., Grimshaw, J., Piaggio, G. G., Lumbiganon, P., & Langer, A. (2004) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-4-2 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Patel, V., Weiss, H. A., Chowdhary, N., Naik, S., Pednekar, S., Chatterjee, S., De Silva, M. J., Bhat, B., Araya, R., King, M., et al. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61508-5 · Cited by 752 · see citing works
Patel, V., Weiss, H. A., Chowdhary, N., Naik, S., Pednekar, S., Chatterjee, S., Bhat, B., Araya, R., King, M., Simon, G., et al. (2011) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.111.092155 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cheung, Y. B., Jeffries, D., Thomson, A., & Milligan, P.
- Affiliations
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Cheung, Yin Bun
- Venue
- Tropical Medicine & International Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 247-255
- ISSN
- 1360-2276 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3156
- OpenAlex
- W1651797523
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Tropical Medicine & International Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Keywords
- interaction testing, two-sample t-test, Wilcoxon test, statistical power, type I error, sample size formula, health education intervention
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Community Health Services, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Gambia, Health Education, Humans, Malaria, Male, Research Design, Models, Statistical, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Sample Size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
