The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intrinsic correlation of galaxy shapes: implications for weak lensing measurements
Open accessAbstract
Weak gravitational lensing is now established as a powerful method to measure mass fluctuations in the universe. It relies on the measurement of small coherent distortions of the images of background galaxies. Even low-level correlations in the intrinsic shapes of galaxies could however produce a significant spurious lensing signal. These correlations are also interesting in their own right, since their detection would constrain models of galaxy formation. Using haloes found in N-body simulations, we compute the correlation functions of the intrinsic ellipticity of spiral galaxies assuming that the disc is perpendicular to the angular momentum of the dark matter halo. We also consider a simple model for elliptical galaxies, in which the shape of the dark matter halo is assumed to be the same as that of the light. For deep lensing surveys with median redshifts ∼1, we find that intrinsic correlations of ∼10−4 on angular scales are generally below the expected lensing signal, and contribute only a small fraction of the excess signals reported on these scales. On larger scales we find limits to the intrinsic correlation function at a level ∼10−5, which gives a (model-dependent) range of separations for which the intrinsic signal is about an order of magnitude below the ellipticity correlation function expected from weak lensing. Intrinsic correlations are thus negligible on these scales for dedicated weak lensing surveys. For wider but shallower surveys such as SuperCOSMOS, APM and SDSS, we cannot exclude the possibility that intrinsic correlations could dominate the lensing signal. We discuss how such surveys could be used to calibrate the importance of this effect, as well as study spin–spin correlations of spiral galaxies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Origin of the Angular Momentum of Galaxies
Peebles, P. J. E. (1969) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/149876 · Cited by 1,049
Mapping the dark matter with weak gravitational lensing
Kaiser, N., & Squires, G. (1993) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/172297 · Cited by 860
Non-linear evolution of cosmological power spectra
Peacock, J. A., & Dodds, S. J. (1996) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/280.3.l19 · Cited by 783
The Analysis of Counts of the Extragalactic Nebulae in Terms of a Fluctuating Density Field.
Limber, D. N. (1953) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/145672 · Cited by 770
Wittman, D. M., Tyson, J. A., Kirkman, D., Dell'Antonio, I., & Bernstein, G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35012001 · Cited by 605
Angular momentum growth in protogalaxies
White, S. D. M. (1984) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/162573 · Cited by 588
The Analysis of Counts of the Extragalactic Nebulae in Terms of a Fluctuating Density Field. II.
Limber, D. N. (1954) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/145870 · Cited by 568
Evolution of Structure in Cold Dark Matter Universes
Jenkins, A., Frenk, C. S., Pearce, F. R., Thomas, P. A., Colberg, J. M., White, S. D. M., Couchman, H. M. P., Peacock, J. A., Efstathiou, G., Nelson, A. H., et al. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305615 · Cited by 556
Angular momentum from tidal torques
Barnes, J., & Efstathiou, G. (1987) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/165480 · Cited by 542
Probing the Universe with Weak Lensing
Mellier, Y. (1999) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.127 · Cited by 490
Cited by
Large-scale structure of the Universe and cosmological perturbation theory
Bernardeau, F., Colombi, S., Gaztañaga, E., & Scoccimarro, R. (2002) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(02)00135-7 · Cited by 1,922
Heymans, C., Grocutt, E., Heavens, A., Kilbinger, M., Kitching, T. D., Simpson, F., Benjamin, J., Erben, T., Hildebrandt, H., Hoekstra, H., et al. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt601 · Cited by 649
Self-citationCosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
Kilbinger, M. (2015) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086901 · Cited by 604
Intrinsic alignment-lensing interference as a contaminant of cosmic shear
Hirata, C. M., & Seljak, U. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.063526 · Cited by 586
Bridle, S., & King, L. (2007) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/12/444 · Cited by 492
Metadata
- Authors
- Heavens, A., Refregier, A. R., & Heymans, C.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2000-12-01
- Volume
- 319
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 649-656
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097641450
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 15.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intrinsic correlation of galaxy shapes: implications for weak lensing measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03907.x
- The paper
- Heavens, A., Refregier, A. R., & Heymans, C. (2000). Intrinsic correlation of galaxy shapes: implications for weak lensing measurements. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03907.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.