The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Primary‐care patients’ expectations and experiences of online cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a qualitative study
Open accessAbstract
Objective To explore expectations and experiences of online cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) among primary‐care patients with depression, focusing on how this mode of delivery impacts upon the therapeutic experience. Design Qualitative study, using repeat semi‐structured interviews with patients before and after therapy. The study was conducted in parallel with a randomized controlled trial examining the effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of online CBT for patients with depression. Participants Twenty‐four patients with depression recruited from five general practices in southwest England, who were offered up to 10 sessions of CBT, delivered via the internet by a psychologist. Results Most participants accessed the therapy from their home computer and found this to be a major advantage, in terms of convenience and fitting therapy into their daily routine, with any technical problems quickly resolved. Two key themes regarding expectations and experiences of online CBT were: developing a virtual relationship with a therapist, and the process of communicating thoughts and emotions via an online medium. Online CBT seems to be acceptable to, and experienced as helpful by, certain subgroups of patients with depression, particularly those who are familiar with computers, feel comfortable with writing their feelings down, enjoy the opportunities to review and reflect that written (or typed) communication offers are attracted to the ‘anonymity’ of an online therapeutic relationship and are open to the proactive requirements of CBT itself. However, on‐line CBT may feed into the vulnerability of depressed people to negative thoughts, given the absence of visual cues and the immediate response of face‐to‐face interaction. Conclusions Online CBT has the potential to enhance care for patients with depression who are open to engaging in ‘talking’ (or typing) therapies as part of their treatment. If online CBT is to be provided via the NHS, it is important to establish patient preferences regarding this mode of delivery and ensure that referral practices are appropriately targeted. The results of our main trial will provide evidence regarding the effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of receiving therapy via this modality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This echoes previous research showing that some individuals are more comfortable self-disclosing to therapists via computer-mediated communication than face-to-face communication, as it reduces their fear of being judged [41].”
From User Experiences of Social Support From Companion Chatbots in Everyday Contexts: Thematic Analysis (2020) · cites this paper as [41]
In the citing paper
“Studies on the experiences of patients with online therapy also show that personal feedback and support are perceived as positive among patients, to optimally use the program and to keep them motivated [12-14].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
Basics of Qualitative Research
Ozanne, J. L., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172751 · Cited by 17,852
(1990) · Cited by 11,110
Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data
Pope, C. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114 · Cited by 8,131
Gosby, J. R. (2000) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-7-01210.x · Cited by 2,001
Can You See the Real Me? Activation and Expression of the “True Self” on the Internet
Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y. A., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00247 · Cited by 1,301
Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions
Oakley, A., Strange, V., Bonell, C., Allen, E., & Stephenson, J. (2006) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413 · Cited by 1,247
Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet: randomised controlled trial
Christensen, H. (2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.37945.566632.ee · Cited by 928
Donovan, J., Little, P., Mills, N., Smith, M., Brindle, L., Jacoby, A., Peters, T., Frankel, S., Neal, D., & Hamdy, F. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7367.766 · Cited by 533
Proudfoot, J., Ryden, C., Everitt, B., Shapiro, D. A., Goldberg, D., Mann, A., Tylee, A., Marks, I., & Gray, J. A. (2004) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.185.1.46 · Cited by 516
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2004, Depression: Management of Depression in Primary and Secondary Care
- Lewis G, 1990, Manual of the Revised Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS‐R)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
O’Connor, S., Hanlon, P., O’Donnell, C. A., Garcia, S., Glanville, J., & Mair, F. S. (2016) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-016-0359-3 · Cited by 636
User Experiences of Social Support From Companion Chatbots in Everyday Contexts: Thematic Analysis
Ta, V., Griffith, C., Boatfield, C., Wang, X., Civitello, M., Bader, H., DeCero, E., & Loggarakis, A. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/16235 · Cited by 561
“This echoes previous research showing that some individuals are more comfortable self-disclosing to therapists via computer-mediated communication than face-to-face communication, as it reduces their fear of being judged [41].”
BackgroundKessler, D., Lewis, G., Kaur, S., Wiles, N., King, M., Weich, S., Sharp, D. J., Araya, R., Hollinghurst, S., & Peters, T. J. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61257-5 · Cited by 387
Self-citationBowling, A., Rowe, G., Lambert, N., Waddington, M., Mahtani, K., Kenten, C., Howe, A., & Francis, S. (2012) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta16300 · Cited by 326
Musiat, P., Goldstone, P., & Tarrier, N. (2014) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-14-109 · Cited by 273
“Although it is relatively well established that mental health service users highly value the personal component of face-toface therapy [21], it is possible that the high importance ratings found in this study are somewhat an artefact of directly comparing self-help treatments against face-toface therapy.”
BackgroundResult
Metadata
- Authors
- Beattie, A., Shaw, A., Kaur, S., & Kessler, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB)
- Venue
- Health Expectations
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-02-27
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-59
- ISSN
- 1369-6513 (ISSN-L)
- 1369-7625
- PMC
- PMC5060477
- OpenAlex
- W1981927499
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 9.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health Expectations (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (CL-2007-25-001)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, depression, primary care, patient expectations, patient experience, therapeutic relationship, anonymity, written communication, computer literacy, acceptability, face-to-face interaction
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Depression, England, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Patient Satisfaction, Internet, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
