Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 247

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mild asthma: an expert review on epidemiology, clinical characteristics and treatment recommendations

Open access
Dusser, D., Montani, D., Chanez, P., De Blic, J., Delacourt, C., Deschildre, A., Devillier, P., Didier, A., Leroyer, C., Marguet, C., Martinat, Y., Piquet, J., Raherison, C., Serrier, P., Tillie‐Leblond, I., Tonnel, A.‐B., Lara, M. T. de, Humbert, M.·2007·Allergy

Abstract

This review is the synthesis of a working group on mild asthma. Mild asthma includes intermittent and persistent mild asthma according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) classification, and affects between 50% and 75% of asthmatic patients. Mild asthma is more frequent, more symptomatic, and less well controlled in children than in adults. Cohort studies from childhood to adulthood show that asthma severity usually remains stable over time. Nevertheless, mild asthma can lead to severe exacerbations, with a frequency ranging from 0.12 to 0.77 per patient‐year. Severe exacerbations in mild asthma represent 30–40% of asthma exacerbations requiring emergency consultation. In mild asthma, inflammation and structural remodelling are constant, of varying intensity, but nonspecific. Therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) decreases bronchial inflammation, but has only a slight effect on structural remodelling, and, when stopped, inflammation immediately recurs. Permanent low‐dose ICS therapy is the reference treatment for persistent mild asthma. Effectiveness is to be reassessed at 3 months, and if it is insufficient the patient is no longer considered mildly asthmatic, and treatment has to be stepped up. As mild asthma is the most frequent form of the disease, diagnosis and management require physicians’ particular attention.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01394.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 247

Metadata

Authors
Dusser, D., Montani, D., Chanez, P., De Blic, J., Delacourt, C., Deschildre, A., Devillier, P., Didier, A., Leroyer, C., Marguet, C., Martinat, Y., Piquet, J., Raherison, C., Serrier, P., Tillie‐Leblond, I., Tonnel, A. ‐., Lara, M. T. D., & Humbert, M.
Venue
Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-05-14
Volume
62
Issue
6
Pages
591-604
ISSN
  • 0105-4538 (ISSN-L)
  • 1398-9995
OpenAlex
W1970708453
Cited by
247
References
3
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mild asthma: an expert review on epidemiology, clinical characteristics and treatment recommendations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01394.x
The paper
Dusser, D., Montani, D., Chanez, P., De Blic, J., Delacourt, C., Deschildre, A., Devillier, P., Didier, A., Leroyer, C., Marguet, C., Martinat, Y., Piquet, J., Raherison, C., Serrier, P., Tillie‐Leblond, I., Tonnel, A. ‐., Lara, M. T. D., & Humbert, M. (2007). Mild asthma: an expert review on epidemiology, clinical characteristics and treatment recommendations. Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01394.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.