The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Uptake and Distribution of Mercury within Higher Plants
Abstract
The uptake and distribution of inorganic mercury (HgCl 2) within higher plants (Pisum sativum and Mentha spicata) was examined using solution culture and radiotracer techniques. Plants were found to tolerate an external level of 1 mgHg/kg of solution but both physiological and biochemical processes were affected at 5 mgHg/kg and 10 mgHg/kg. The uptake of Hg into plants grown in hydroponic solution was a function of external concentration. Over the concentration range considered the accumulation of Hg in the roots was linear on a log‐log basis although the uptake of the element into the shoots appeared to be two‐phased. The distribution of Hg in plants was asymmetrical with much greater amounts of the element in the roots than the shoots. Although the level of Hg increased generally in plant tissues with increasing external levels, the proportion retained in the roots, relative to the shoots, was constant (approximately 95%). Two binding characteristics of the Hg within plant tissue were detected. A major proportion of Hg was tightly bound, being unaffected by treatment with ethanol and hydrochloric acid. The remaining Hg in the tissue was removed by either water or hydrochloric acid treatment. Cell fractionation indicated that the major binding component of Hg in plant tissues was the cell wall.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mercury in the Swedish environment ? Recent research on causes, consequences and corrective methods
Lindqvist, O., Johansson, K., Bringmark, L., Timm, B., Aastrup, M., Andersson, A., Hovsenius, G., H�kanson, L., Iverfeldt, �., & Meili, M. (1991) · Water, Air, & Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/bf00542429 · Cited by 965
Cycling of mercury in the environment: Sources, fate, and human health implications: A review
Beckers, F., & Rinklebe, J. (2017) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2017.1326277 · Cited by 623
Phytotoxicity of mercury in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)
Shiyab, S., Chen, J., Han, F. X., Monts, D. L., Matta, F. B., Gu, M., & Su, Y. (2009) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2008.06.002 · Cited by 99
Limited biomass recovery from gold mining in Amazonian forests
Kalamandeen, M., Gloor, E., Johnson, I., Agard, S., Katow, M., Vanbrooke, A., Ashley, D., Batterman, S. A., Ziv, G., Holder‐Collins, K., et al. (2020) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13669 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- BEAUFORD, W., BARBER, J., & BARRINGER, A. R.
- Venue
- Physiologia Plantarum
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1977-04
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 261-265
- ISSN
- 0031-9317 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3054
- OpenAlex
- W1992259776
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uptake and Distribution of Mercury within Higher Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1977.tb01880.x
- The paper
- BEAUFORD, W., BARBER, J., & BARRINGER, A. R. (1977). Uptake and Distribution of Mercury within Higher Plants. Physiologia Plantarum. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1977.tb01880.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.