Cited by 99Mercury impact and mitigation studiesHeavy metals in environmentEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

Phytotoxicity of mercury in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)

Shiyab, Safwan, Chen, Jian, Han, Fengxiang X., Monts, David L., Matta, Frank B., Gu, Mengmeng, Su, Yi·2009·Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety

Abstract

This study investigated the phytotoxicity of mercury to Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Two common cultivars (Florida Broad Leaf and Long-standing) were grown hydroponically in a mercury-spiked solution. Mercury exhibited a significant phytotoxicity in these two cultivars of Indian mustard at elevated concentrations (>or=2 mg L(-1)). Mercury uptake induced a significant reduction in both biomass and leaf relative water content. Microscopy studies indicated that elevated mercury concentrations in plants significantly changed leaf cellular structure: thickly stained areas surrounding the vascular bundles; decreases in the number of palisade and spongy parenchyma cells; and reduced cell size and clotted depositions. The palisade chloroplasts exhibited decreases in their amounts and starch grains as well as a loss of spindle shape. However, due to high accumulation of mercury in plants, especially in the roots, Indian mustard might be a potential candidate plant for phytofiltration of contaminated water and phytostabilization of mercury-contaminated soils.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2008.06.002

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The permeability of cell membranes and the number of palisades may be reduced in the presence of mercury, resulting in the buildup of Fe and the loss of essential elements like Mg and K.

    “The permeability of cell membranes and the number of palisades may be reduced in the presence of Hg, resulting in the buildup of Fe and the loss of essential elements like Mgand K (Shiyab et al., 2009; Tangahu et al., 2011; Azevedo and Rodriguez, 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shiyab, S., Chen, J., Han, F. X., Monts, D. L., Matta, F. B., Gu, M., & Su, Y.
Affiliations
Mississippi State University (US)
Corresponding author
Han, Fengxiang X.
Venue
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
72
Issue
2
Pages
619-625
ISSN
0147-6513 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964386164
Cited by
99
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Office of Science
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
mercury, phytotoxicity, Brassica juncea, mercury uptake, leaf relative water content, leaf cell structure, chloroplast morphology, starch granules, cultivar differences, phytofiltration, phytostabilization, mercury-contaminated soil, hydroponics
MeSH terms
Brassica, Chloroplasts, Mercury, Microscopy, Mustard Plant, Soil Pollutants, Plant Roots

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review