Cited by 66Banana Cultivation and ResearchPlant tissue culture and regenerationPlant Genetic and Mutation Studies

Genomic changes associated with somaclonal variation in banana ( Musa spp.)

Oh, Thomas J., Cullis, Margaret A., Kunert, Karl, Engelborghs, Iris, Swennen, Rony, Cullis, Christopher A.·2007·Physiologia Plantarum

Abstract

The molecular basis of somaclonal variation is not precisely known, but both genetic and epigenetic mechanisms have been proposed. The available evidence points toward the existence of labile portions of the genome that can be modulated when the cells undergo the stress of tissue culture. Therefore, the hypothesis that there are identifiable and predictable DNA markers for the early diagnosis of somaclonal variation has been tested. Representational difference analysis was used to isolate unique fragments of DNA (difference products) between visible culture-induced off-type and normal banana plants. Markers generated from six difference products differentiated between some of the off-type and normal pairs. The genomic region around one of these difference products has been extensively characterized and has a high degree of polymorphism, with variation in up to 10% of the nucleotides sequenced in the region. This same region has been shown to vary in other pairs of off-type and normal banana plants derived from tissue culture as well as in plants propagated commercially in vitro. The data are consistent with the hypothesis that there is at least one particularly labile portion of the genome that is especially susceptible to the stress imposed during tissue culture and that is associated with higher rearrangement and mutation rates than other portions of the genome. Consequently, the regions that are reported here have the potential to be used as early detection tools for ident…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.00858.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Epigenetic variability observed at the phenotype level reflects adaptations of cellular processes to constraints of in vitro cultivation, which usually implies sequential dedifferentiation and re-differentiation.

    “This epigenetic variability, which frequently is observed at phenotype level, reflects, in reality, the adaptations of the cellular processes to the various constraints of the in vitro cultivation technology, that usually implies sequential dedifferentiation (formation of callus) and re-differentiation (regeneration of plants) [91,95,96,97,98,99,100].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oh, T. J., Cullis, M. A., Kunert, K., Engelborghs, I., Swennen, R., & Cullis, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (ZA)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
Corresponding author
Cullis, Christopher A.
Venue
Physiologia Plantarum
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-02-12
Volume
129
Issue
4
Pages
766-774
ISSN
  • 0031-9317 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3054
OpenAlex
W2166156232
Cited by
66
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiologia Plantarum (publishedVersion)
  • UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Banana Cultivation and Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
Keywords
somaclonal variation, banana, Musa, representational difference analysis, DNA markers, mutation rate, epigenetic mechanisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review