The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional outcome in bipolar disorder: the role of clinical and cognitive factors
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Few studies have examined the clinical, neuropsychological and pharmacological factors involved in the functional outcome of bipolar disorder despite the gap between clinical and functional recovery. Methods: A sample of 77 euthymic bipolar patients were included in the study. Using an a priori definition of low versus good functional outcome, based on the psychosocial items of the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF, DSM‐IV), and taking also into account their occupational adaptation, the patients were divided into two groups: good or low occupational functioning. Patients with high (n = 46) and low (n = 31) functioning were compared on several clinical, neuropsychological and pharmacological variables and the two patient groups were contrasted with healthy controls (n = 35) on cognitive performance. Results: High‐ and low‐functioning groups did not differ with respect to clinical variables. However, bipolar patients in general showed poorer cognitive performance than healthy controls. This was most evident in low‐functioning patients and in particular on verbal memory and executive function measures. Conclusions: Low‐functioning patients were cognitively more impaired than highly functioning patients on verbal recall and executive functions. The variable that best predicted psychosocial functioning in bipolar patients was verbal memory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hamilton, M. (1960) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 · Cited by 32,817
The assessment of anxiety states by rating
HAMILTON, M. (1959) · British Journal of Medical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1959.tb00467.x · Cited by 11,455
A Rating Scale for Mania: Reliability, Validity and Sensitivity
Young, R. C., Biggs, J. T., Ziegler, V. E., & Meyer, D. A. (1978) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.133.5.429 · Cited by 8,744
Screening for serious mental illness in the general population
Kessler, R. C., Barker, P. R., Colpe, L. J., Epstein, J. F., Gfroerer, J. C., Hiripi, E., Howes, M. J., Normand, S.-L. T., Manderscheid, R. W., Walters, E. E., et al. (2003) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.184 · Cited by 5,692
Premorbid Social Functioning in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder: Similarities and Differences
Cannon, M., Jones, P., Gilvarry, C., Rifkin, L., McKenzie, K., Foerster, A., & Murray, R. M. (1997) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.154.11.1544 · Cited by 345
A new validation of the Hamilton Rating Scale for depression
Ramos-Brieva, J. A., & Cordero-Villafafila, A. (1988) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(88)90024-6 · Cited by 238
Different trait markers for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a neurocognitive approach
KÉRI, S., KELEMEN, O., BENEDEK, G., & JANKA, Z. (2001) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291701004068 · Cited by 214
Subsyndromal Depression Is Associated With Functional Impairment in Patients With Bipolar Disorder
Altshuler, L. L., Gitlin, M. J., Mintz, J., Leight, K. L., & Frye, M. A. (2002) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.v63n0910 · Cited by 174
Effect of number of episodes on wellbeing and functioning of patients with bipolar disorder
MacQueen, G. M., Young, L. T., Robb, J. C., Marriott, M., Cooke, R. G., & Joffe, R. T. (2000) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0447.2000.101005374.x · Cited by 151
Cited by
Grande, I., Berk, M., Birmaher, B., & Vieta, E. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00241-x · Cited by 1,710
Self-citationBerk, M., Kapczinski, F., Andreazza, A. C., Dean, O. M., Giorlando, F., Maes, M., Yücel, M., Gama, C. S., Dodd, S., Dean, B., et al. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.10.001 · Cited by 1,178
Self-citationValidity and reliability of the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) in bipolar disorder
Rosa, A. R., Sánchez-Moreno, J., Martínez-Aran, A., Salamero, M., Torrent, C., Reinares, M., Comes, M., Colom, F., Van Riel, W., Ayuso-Mateos, J., et al. (2007) · Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health · doi:10.1186/1745-0179-3-5 · Cited by 905
Self-citationVieta, E., Berk, M., Schulze, T. G., Carvalho, A. F., Suppes, T., Calabrese, J. R., Gao, K., Miskowiak, K. W., & Grande, I. (2018) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2018.8 · Cited by 891
Self-citationTohen, M., Frank, E., Bowden, C. L., Colom, F., Ghaemi, S. N., Yatham, L. N., Malhi, G. S., Calabrese, J. R., Nolen, W. A., Vieta, E., et al. (2009) · Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2009.00726.x · Cited by 513
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Martinez‐Aran, A., Vieta, E., Torrent, C., Sanchez‐Moreno, J., Goikolea, J., Salamero, M., Malhi, G., Gonzalez‐Pinto, A., Daban, C., Alvarez‐Grandi, S., Fountoulakis, K., Kaprinis, G., Tabares‐Seisdedos, R., & Ayuso‐Mateos, J.
- Venue
- Bipolar Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 103-113
- ISSN
- 1398-5647 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-5618
- OpenAlex
- W2042569361
- Cited by
- 585
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 22.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional outcome in bipolar disorder: the role of clinical and cognitive factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00327.x
- The paper
- Martinez‐Aran, A., Vieta, E., Torrent, C., Sanchez‐Moreno, J., Goikolea, J., Salamero, M., Malhi, G., Gonzalez‐Pinto, A., Daban, C., Alvarez‐Grandi, S., Fountoulakis, K., Kaprinis, G., Tabares‐Seisdedos, R., & Ayuso‐Mateos, J. (2007). Functional outcome in bipolar disorder: the role of clinical and cognitive factors. Bipolar Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00327.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
