Cited by 53Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentSchizophrenia research and treatmentPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Social competence and observer‐rated social functioning in bipolar disorder

Open access
Depp, Colin A, Mausbach, Brent T, Harvey, Philip D, Bowie, Christopher R, Wolyniec, Paula S, Thornquist, Mary H, Luke, James R, McGrath, John A +2 more·2010·Bipolar Disorders

Abstract

Depp CA, Mausbach BT, Harvey PD, Bowie CR, Wolyniec PS, Thornquist MH, Luke JR, McGrath JA, Pulver AE, Patterson TL. Social competence and observer‐rated social functioning in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 2010: 12: 843–850. © 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Objective: Impairment in social functioning appears to be common in bipolar disorder, although estimates have been derived largely from self‐report measures. We examined performance‐based and observer‐based ratings of social competence and functioning and assessed the contribution of symptoms and neurocognitive ability to social functioning in bipolar disorder. Methods: In this cross‐sectional study, 164 subjects with bipolar disorder were administered the performance‐based Social Skills Performance Assessment (SSPA), rated by an informant on the Specific Level of Functioning (SLOF)–Interpersonal subscale, received clinical ratings of depression and manic symptoms, and performed neurocognitive tests. We assessed the proportion of patients exhibiting social deficits and examined the associations between composite measures of neurocognitive ability, depression and manic symptoms, and SSPA scores with informant‐rated, real‐world social functioning. Results: Mean age of the sample was 47.6 years (SD = 14.1). Subjects were experiencing, on average, mild levels of depression and minimal manic symptoms. A total of 29% exhibited norm‐referenced impairment on the SSPA, and 64% registered at least one impairment on SLOF items; unemployed subjects had lower SSPA and SLOF ratings. Neurocognitive performance correlated with both performance‐based and observer‐rated social functioning, whereas depressive and manic symptoms correlated only with observer‐rated social impairments. In multivariate models, depression was the most potent association with social functioning, and impairment in social competence (i.e., capacity) increased the strength of the relationships between depression and neurocognitive impairment and social functioning (i.e., real‐world functioning). Conclusions: Our study confirmed the negative relationship of bipolar depression with social functioning. A subgroup of outpatients with bipolar disorder has impaired social competence, which, when present, worsened the impact of depression and cognitive impairment on social functioning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2010.00880.x

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]Murray C Lopez A Global Burden of Disease 1996 Harvard University Press Geneva

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Depp, C. A., Mausbach, B. T., Harvey, P. D., Bowie, C. R., Wolyniec, P. S., Thornquist, M. H., Luke, J. R., McGrath, J. A., Pulver, A. E., & Patterson, T. L.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Depp, Colin A
Venue
Bipolar Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12
Volume
12
Issue
8
Pages
843-850
ISSN
  • 1398-5647 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-5618
OpenAlex
W1936945751
Cited by
53
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bipolar Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH078775, R34MH091260, K23MH077225, R01MH078737, R01MH079784)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
bipolar disorder, social functioning, social competence, bipolar depression, manic symptoms, neurocognitive impairment, unemployment, outpatients
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Cognition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Employment, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review