The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta‐analysis of the association between cognitive abilities and everyday functioning in bipolar disorder
Open accessAbstract
Depp CA, Mausbach BT, Harmell AL, Savla GN, Bowie CR, Harvey PD, Patterson TL. Meta‐analysis of the association between cognitive abilities and everyday functioning in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 2012: 14: 217–226. © 2012 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Objectives: Neurocognitive deficits are common in bipolar disorder and contribute to functional disability. However, the degree to which general and specific cognitive deficits affect everyday functioning in bipolar disorder is unknown. The goal of this meta‐analysis was to examine the magnitude of the effect of specific neurocognitive abilities on everyday functioning in bipolar disorder. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive meta‐analysis of studies that reported associations between performance on objective neuropsychological tasks and everyday functioning among individuals with bipolar disorder. From an initial pool of 486 papers, 22 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 1344 participants. Correlation coefficients were calculated for 11 cognitive domains and four measurement modalities for functioning. We also examined effect moderators, such as sample age, clinical state, and study design. Results: The mean Pearson correlation between neurocognitive ability and functioning was 0.27, and was significant for all cognitive domains and varied little by cognitive domain. Correlations varied by methods of everyday functioning assessment, being lower for clinician and self‐report than performance‐based tasks and real‐world milestones such as employment. None of the moderator analyses were significant. Conclusions: Overall, the strength of association between cognitive ability and everyday functioning in bipolar disorder is strikingly similar to that seen in schizophrenia, with little evidence for differences across cognitive domains. The strength of association differed to a greater extent according to functional measurement approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fett, A.-K. J., Viechtbauer, W., Dominguez, M.-D.-G., Penn, D. L., van Os, J., & Krabbendam, L. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.07.001 · Cited by 1,833
On the Use of Beta Coefficients in Meta-Analysis.
Peterson, R. A., & Brown, S. P. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.175 · Cited by 1,643
Judd, L. L., Akiskal, H. S., Schettler, P. J., Endicott, J., Leon, A. C., Solomon, D. A., Coryell, W., Maser, J. D., & Keller, M. B. (2005) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.12.1322 · Cited by 577 · cited 1×
“An additional concern is the potential confounding effect of mood symptoms on the relationship between cognitive ability and functioning, as depressive or manic symptoms are associated with both cognitive performance(10, 11) and functioning(12).”
BackgroundThe neuropsychology and neuroanatomy of bipolar affective disorder: a critical review
Bearden, C. E., Hoffman, K. M., & Cannon, T. D. (2001) · Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1034/j.1399-5618.2001.030302.x · Cited by 565
Bax, L., Yu, L.-M., Ikeda, N., Tsuruta, H., & Moons, K. G. (2006) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-50 · Cited by 514
Reichenberg, A., Weiser, M., Rabinowitz, J., Caspi, A., Schmeidler, J., Mark, M., Kaplan, Z., & Davidson, M. (2002) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.12.2027 · Cited by 359
Social competence and observer‐rated social functioning in bipolar disorder
Depp, C. A., Mausbach, B. T., Harvey, P. D., Bowie, C. R., Wolyniec, P. S., Thornquist, M. H., Luke, J. R., McGrath, J. A., Pulver, A. E., & Patterson, T. L. (2010) · Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2010.00880.x · Cited by 53
Self-citation
Cited by
Yatham, L. N., Kennedy, S. H., Parikh, S. V., Schaffer, A., Bond, D. J., Frey, B. N., Sharma, V., Goldstein, B. I., Rej, S., Beaulieu, S., et al. (2018) · Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1111/bdi.12609 · Cited by 1,852
Identification of a Common Neurobiological Substrate for Mental Illness
Goodkind, M., Eickhoff, S. B., Oathes, D. J., Jiang, Y., Chang, A., Jones-Hagata, L. B., Ortega, B. N., Zaiko, Y. V., Roach, E. L., Korgaonkar, M. S., et al. (2015) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2206 · Cited by 1,404
Efficacy of Functional Remediation in Bipolar Disorder: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study
Torrent, C., Bonnin, C. D. M., Martínez-Arán, A., Valle, J., Amann, B. L., González-Pinto, A., Crespo, J. M., Ibáñez, Á., Garcia-Portilla, M. P., Tabarés-Seisdedos, R., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12070971 · Cited by 330
Cognitive deficits in bipolar disorders: Implications for emotion
Lima, I. M. M., Peckham, A. D., & Johnson, S. L. (2018) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2017.11.006 · Cited by 250
Psychosocial interventions in bipolar disorder: What, for whom, and when
Reinares, M., Sánchez-Moreno, J., & Fountoulakis, K. N. (2014) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2013.12.017 · Cited by 184
Metadata
- Authors
- Depp, C. A., Mausbach, B. T., Harmell, A. L., Savla, G. N., Bowie, C. R., Harvey, P. D., & Patterson, T. L.
- Venue
- Bipolar Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 217-226
- ISSN
- 1398-5647 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-5618
- OpenAlex
- W2146170358
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 10.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
