Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 523

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Aspiration during anaesthesia: a computer‐aided study of 185 358 anaesthetics

OLSSON, G. L., HALLEN, B., HAMBRAEUS‐JONZON, K.·1986·Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Abstract

In order to estimate the incidence and significance of aspiration during anaesthesia, a study of cases in which this complication had occurred was made at the Karolinska Hospital. With the aid of the anaesthetic record‐keeping system of the Department of Anaesthesia and the computer‐based register of diagnoses of in‐patients at the hospital, all cases in which aspiration was recorded were retrieved. Eighty‐three cases of aspiration were retrieved from the file of anaesthetic records and four from the in‐patient register. This constitutes an incidence of 4.7 aspirations in 10 000 anaesthetics, or 1 in 2131. The patients most often affected were children and the elderly. In 83% of the cases there were one or more preoperative factors indicating an increased risk for aspiration, such as emergency operation (38 cases, 43%), upper abdominal or emergency abdominal surgery (14 cases, 16%), a history indicating delayed gastric emptying (e. g. peptic ulcer/gastritis, pregnancy, obesity, unusual stress or pain, elevated intracranial pressure, 54 cases, 61%). In 29 cases (33%) there was a history indicating an increased risk of regurgitation, e. g. nasogastric tube, oesophageal disease or pregnancy. In 15 cases of elective surgery, no history of increased risk for aspiration could be found. In 67% of those cases the aspiration was preceded by difficulties involving the airways or intubation. The incidence of aspiration was more than sixfold higher during the night than during regular daytime working hours. In 41 cases (47%) the aspiration led to aspiration pneumonitis confirmed by x‐ray. Fifteen patients (17%) needed mechanical ventilation, and four died. The mortality due to aspiration during anaesthesia was estimated to be 0.2 per 10 000 anaesthetics, and the mortality when aspiration had occurred during anaesthesia was approximately 5%. The conclusion to be drawn from this study is that today the mortality due to aspiration during anaesthesia is low. The patients in this study who died were in poor physical condition before the operation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1986.tb02373.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 523

Metadata

Authors
OLSSON, G. L., HALLEN, B., & HAMBRAEUS‐JONZON, K.
Venue
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
84-92
ISSN
  • 0001-5172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-6576
OpenAlex
W2123134328
Cited by
523
References
0
FWCI
8.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aspiration during anaesthesia: a computer‐aided study of 185 358 anaesthetics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1986.tb02373.x
The paper
OLSSON, G. L., HALLEN, B., & HAMBRAEUS‐JONZON, K. (1986). Aspiration during anaesthesia: a computer‐aided study of 185 358 anaesthetics. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1986.tb02373.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.