The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Aspiration during anaesthesia: a computer‐aided study of 185 358 anaesthetics
Abstract
In order to estimate the incidence and significance of aspiration during anaesthesia, a study of cases in which this complication had occurred was made at the Karolinska Hospital. With the aid of the anaesthetic record‐keeping system of the Department of Anaesthesia and the computer‐based register of diagnoses of in‐patients at the hospital, all cases in which aspiration was recorded were retrieved. Eighty‐three cases of aspiration were retrieved from the file of anaesthetic records and four from the in‐patient register. This constitutes an incidence of 4.7 aspirations in 10 000 anaesthetics, or 1 in 2131. The patients most often affected were children and the elderly. In 83% of the cases there were one or more preoperative factors indicating an increased risk for aspiration, such as emergency operation (38 cases, 43%), upper abdominal or emergency abdominal surgery (14 cases, 16%), a history indicating delayed gastric emptying (e. g. peptic ulcer/gastritis, pregnancy, obesity, unusual stress or pain, elevated intracranial pressure, 54 cases, 61%). In 29 cases (33%) there was a history indicating an increased risk of regurgitation, e. g. nasogastric tube, oesophageal disease or pregnancy. In 15 cases of elective surgery, no history of increased risk for aspiration could be found. In 67% of those cases the aspiration was preceded by difficulties involving the airways or intubation. The incidence of aspiration was more than sixfold higher during the night than during regular daytime working hours. In 41 cases (47%) the aspiration led to aspiration pneumonitis confirmed by x‐ray. Fifteen patients (17%) needed mechanical ventilation, and four died. The mortality due to aspiration during anaesthesia was estimated to be 0.2 per 10 000 anaesthetics, and the mortality when aspiration had occurred during anaesthesia was approximately 5%. The conclusion to be drawn from this study is that today the mortality due to aspiration during anaesthesia is low. The patients in this study who died were in poor physical condition before the operation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cook, T. M., Woodall, N., & Frerk, C. (2011) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aer058 · Cited by 2,415
Complete reversal of acid-induced acute lung injury by blocking of platelet-neutrophil aggregation
Zarbock, A., Singbartl, K., & Ley, K. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci29499 · Cited by 601
Perioperative Pulmonary Aspiration in Infants and Children
Warner, M. A., Warner, M. E., Warner, D. O., Warner, L. O., & Warner, J. E. (1999) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-199901000-00011 · Cited by 300
A low-volume, low-pressure tracheal tube cuff reduces pulmonary aspiration*
Young, P. J., Pakeerathan, S., Blunt, M. C., & Subramanya, S. (2006) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000201406.57821.5b · Cited by 296
Hepatic platelet and leukocyte adherence during endotoxemia
Croner, R. S., Hoerer, E., Kulu, Y., Hackert, T., Gebhard, M.-M., Herfarth, C., & Klar, E. (2006) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc3968 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- OLSSON, G. L., HALLEN, B., & HAMBRAEUS‐JONZON, K.
- Venue
- Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1986-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 84-92
- ISSN
- 0001-5172 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-6576
- OpenAlex
- W2123134328
- Cited by
- 523
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aspiration during anaesthesia: a computer‐aided study of 185 358 anaesthetics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1986.tb02373.x
- The paper
- OLSSON, G. L., HALLEN, B., & HAMBRAEUS‐JONZON, K. (1986). Aspiration during anaesthesia: a computer‐aided study of 185 358 anaesthetics. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1986.tb02373.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.