Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 485

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

O rganizational P rospects, I nfluence C osts, and O wnership C hanges

Meyer, Margaret, Milgrom, Paul, Roberts, John·1992·Journal of Economics & Management Strategy

Abstract

We augment efficiency‐based theories of ownership by including influence costs. Our principal conclusion is that the prospect of organizational decline and layoffs creates additional influence costs in multiunit organizations that would be absent if there was no prospect of layoffs and would be lessened or eliminated in focused organizations. This helps explain the tendency of firms to divest poorly performing units, as well as the pattern of sales of such units to firms already in businesses related to that of the divested unit.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1430-9134.1992.00009.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 485

Metadata

Authors
Meyer, M., Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J.
Venue
Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-03
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
9-35
ISSN
  • 1058-6407 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9134
OpenAlex
W2021791306
Cited by
485
References
1
FWCI
29.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: O rganizational P rospects, I nfluence C osts, and O wnership C hanges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1430-9134.1992.00009.x
The paper
Meyer, M., Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1992). O rganizational P rospects, I nfluence C osts, and O wnership C hanges. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1430-9134.1992.00009.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.