Cited by 1,049Corporate Finance and GovernanceInternational Business and FDIFinancial Reporting and Valuation Research

Global Diversification, Industrial Diversification, and Firm Value

Open access
Denis, David J., Denis, Diane K., Yost, Keven·2002·The Journal of Finance

Abstract

Using a sample of 44,288 firm‐ears between 1984 and 1997, we document an increase in the extent of global diversification over time. This trend does not reflect a substitution of global for industrial diversification. We also find that global diversification results in average valuation discounts of approximately the same magnitude as those for industrial diversification. Analysis of the changes in excess value associated with changes in diversification reveals that increases in global diversification reduce excess value, while reductions in global diversification increase excess value. These findings support the view that the costs of global diversification outweigh the benefits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/0022-1082.00485

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Chevalier, Judith, 1999, Why do firms undertake diversifying mergers? An examination of investment policies of merging firms, Working paper, University of Chicago. 15406261, 2002, 5, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/0022-1082.00485 by Mount Vernon Nazarene University, Wiley Online Library on [23/06/2026]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License · DOI
  2. Meyer, Margaret, Paul Milgrom, and John Roberts, 1992, Organizational prospects, influence costs, and ownership changes, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 1, 9-35.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Yost, K.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Venue
The Journal of Finance
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-10
Volume
57
Issue
5
Pages
1951-1979
ISSN
  • 0022-1082 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-6261
OpenAlex
W2158454654
Cited by
1,049
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 61
FWCI
82.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Finance (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Purdue University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
Keywords
international diversification, industrial diversification, firm value, valuation discounts, excess value

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review