The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nucleotide Sequence and Secondary Structure of Citrus Exocortis and Chrysanthemum Stunt Viroid
Abstract
The complete nucleotide sequence of citrus exocortis viroid (CEV, propagated in Gymura) and chrysanthemum stunt viroid (CSV, propagated in Cineraria) has been established, using labelling in vitro and direct RNA sequencing methods and a new screening procedure for the rapid selection of suitable RNA fragments from limited digests. The covalently closed circular single‐stranded viroid RNAs consist of 371 (CEV) and 354 (CSV) nucleotides, respectively. As previously shown for potato spindle tuber viroid (PSTV, 359 nucleotides), CEV and CSV also contain a long polypurine sequence. Maximal base‐pairing of the established CEV and CSV sequences results in an extended rod‐like secondary structure similar to that previously established for PSTV and as predicted from detailed physicochemical studies of all these viroids. Although the three viroid species sequenced to date differ in size and nucleotide sequence, there is 60–73% homology between them. As PSTV, CEV and CSV also contain conserved complementary sequences which are separated from each other in the native secondary structure. We postulate that the resulting ‘secondary’ hairpins, being formed and observed in vitro during the complex process of thermal denaturation of viroid RNA, must have a vital, although yet unknown, function in vivo. The possible origin and function of viroids are discussed on the basis of the characteristic structural features and of a considerable homology with Ula RNA found for a region highly conserved in the three viroids.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sanger, H. L., Klotz, G., Riesner, D., Gross, H. J., & Kleinschmidt, A. K. (1976) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.73.11.3852 · Cited by 2,296
Self-citation
Cited by
Keese, P., & Symons, R. H. (1985) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.82.14.4582 · Cited by 425
Feng, Y.-X., Campbell, S., Harvin, D., Ehresmann, B., Ehresmann, C., & Rein, A. (1999) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.73.5.4251-4256.1999 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- GROSS, H. J., KRUPP, G., DOMDEY, H., RABA, M., JANK, P., LOSSOW, C., ALBERTY, H., SÄNGER, H. L., & RAMM, K.
- Venue
- European Journal of Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1982-01
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 249-257
- ISSN
- 0014-2956 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1033
- OpenAlex
- W1965068538
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nucleotide Sequence and Secondary Structure of Citrus Exocortis and Chrysanthemum Stunt Viroid. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1982.tb05779.x
- The paper
- GROSS, H. J., KRUPP, G., DOMDEY, H., RABA, M., JANK, P., LOSSOW, C., ALBERTY, H., SÄNGER, H. L., & RAMM, K. (1982). Nucleotide Sequence and Secondary Structure of Citrus Exocortis and Chrysanthemum Stunt Viroid. European Journal of Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1982.tb05779.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.