Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conformation/activity studies of rationally designed potent anti‐adhesive RGD peptides

GURRATH, Marion, MÜLLER, Gerhard, KESSLER, Horst, AUMAILLEY, Monique, TIMPL, Rupert·1992·European Journal of Biochemistry

Abstract

The Arg‐Gly‐Asp (RGD) sequence is a universal cell‐recognition site of various extracellular proteins that interact with integrin cell‐surface receptors. In order to design low‐molecular‐mass RGD protein antagonists, the determination of the biologically active conformation is a prerequisite. We present a method that yields detailed insight into the steric factors which govern the binding of the ligands to their receptors by systematically scanning the conformational space accessible for the tripeptide sequence RGD. The investigation is based on the conformationally controlled design of homodetic cyclic oligopeptides and their structural determination, coupled with biological assays. For this purpose, a whole set of cyclic pentapeptides and hexapeptides has been synthesized and their three‐dimensional structures in solution analyzed by modern two‐dimensional NMR techniques in combination with restrained and free molecular dynamics simulations. Their biological activity was compared with that of linear GRGDS in inhibition assays of tumor cell adhesion to laminin P1 and vitronectin substrates. An up to 100‐fold, and in part selective, increase in activity was observed for two cyclic pentapeptides. Most other peptides showed a decreased activity which, however, was useful to correlate activity with rather small variations in conformation. Detailed comparative studies of the systematically designed conformations and the corresponding anti‐adhesive activities offer an access to lead structures for a rational indirect drug design of peptide and peptidomimetic pharmaceuticals with strong interfering activity for integrin‐mediated cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb17495.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
GURRATH, M., MÜLLER, G., KESSLER, H., AUMAILLEY, M., & TIMPL, R.
Venue
European Journal of Biochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-12
Volume
210
Issue
3
Pages
911-921
ISSN
  • 0014-2956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1033
OpenAlex
W2042274047
Cited by
317
References
30
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conformation/activity studies of rationally designed potent anti‐adhesive RGD peptides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb17495.x
The paper
GURRATH, M., MÜLLER, G., KESSLER, H., AUMAILLEY, M., & TIMPL, R. (1992). Conformation/activity studies of rationally designed potent anti‐adhesive RGD peptides. European Journal of Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb17495.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.