The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Leaf senescence and nutrient remobilisation in barley and wheat
Abstract
Extensive studies have been undertaken on senescence processes in barley and wheat and their importance for the nitrogen use efficiency of these crop plants. During the senescence processes, proteins are degraded and nutrients are re‐mobilised from senescing leaves to other organs, especially the developing grain. Most of the proteins degraded reside in the chloroplasts, with Rubisco constituting the most dominant protein fraction. Despite intensive studies, the proteases responsible for Rubisco degradation have not yet been identified. Evidence for degradation of stromal proteins outside of chloroplasts is summarised. Rubisco is thought to be released from chloroplasts into vesicles containing stroma material (RCB = Rubisco‐containing bodies). These vesicles may then take different routes for their degradation. Transcriptome analyses on barley and wheat senescence have identified genes involved in degradative, metabolic and regulatory processes that could be used in future strategies aimed at modifying the senescence process. The breeding of crops for characters related to senescence processes, e.g. higher yields and better nutrient use efficiency, is complex. Such breeding has to cope with the dilemma that delayed senescence, which could lead to higher yields, is correlated with a decrease in nutrient use efficiency. Pinpointing regulatory genes involved in senescence might lead to tools that could effectively overcome this dilemma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matile, P., Hörtensteiner, S., & Thomas, H. (1999) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.67 · Cited by 515
Cited by
Opportunities for improving phosphorus‐use efficiency in crop plants
Veneklaas, E. J., Lambers, H., Bragg, J., Finnegan, P. M., Lovelock, C. E., Plaxton, W. C., Price, C. A., Scheible, W., Shane, M. W., White, P. J., et al. (2012) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04190.x · Cited by 981
Bogard, M., Allard, V., Brancourt-Hulmel, M., Heumez, E., Machet, J.-M., Jeuffroy, M.-H., Gate, P., Martre, P., & Le Gouis, J. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erq238 · Cited by 334
Prabhakara, K., Hively, W. D., & McCarty, G. W. (2015) · International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2015.03.002 · Cited by 273
Classes of programmed cell death in plants, compared to those in animals
van Doorn, W. G. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/err196 · Cited by 256
Zmienko, A., Samelak-Czajka, A., Goralski, M., Sobieszczuk-Nowicka, E., Kozlowski, P., & Figlerowicz, M. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118226 · Cited by 62
“It occurs in conjunction with dramatic changes in cell metabolism and structure and eventually leads to chloroplast disintegration, leaf protein breakdown, internucleosomal fragmentation of nuclear DNA and ultimately cell death [17–19].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Gregersen, P. L., Holm, P. B., & Krupinska, K.
- Venue
- Plant Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-07-18
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- s1
- Pages
- 37-49
- ISSN
- 1435-8603 (ISSN-L)
- 1438-8677
- OpenAlex
- W2054984057
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Leaf senescence and nutrient remobilisation in barley and wheat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00114.x
- The paper
- Gregersen, P. L., Holm, P. B., & Krupinska, K. (2008). Leaf senescence and nutrient remobilisation in barley and wheat. Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00114.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.