Cited by 86Animal Behavior and ReproductionAnimal Vocal Communication and BehaviorAvian ecology and behavior

Intra‐ and Intersexual Selection for Multiple Traits in the Peacock (Pavo cristatus)

Loyau, Adeline, Jalme, Michel Saint, Sorci, Gabriele·2005·Ethology

Abstract

Animal communication involves a multitude of signals ranging from morphological to behavioural traits. In spite of the diversity of traits used in animal signalling, most studies of sexual selection have focused on single male traits. Moreover, the two forces of sexual selection (male–male competition and female preference) may target different traits and favour the diversification of male signalling. Still, little is known on the combined effects of intra‐ and intersexual selection on the evolution of multiple signals. The peacock is often cited as one of the best examples of the strength of sexual selection in producing exaggerated traits. Here, we investigated traits under intra‐ and intersexual selection in a population of free‐ranging common peafowl. Peacocks with longer trains and tarsi were more likely to establish a display territory in a central position within the lek and had a higher number of intrusions and agonistic interactions. These traits appeared therefore to be under intrasexual selection. Female selection was assessed as the number of copulations. Mating success was positively correlated with behavioural traits (display activity) and with train ornamentation (number and density of ocelli) suggesting that females use multiple cues during mate selection. Therefore, intra‐ and intersexual selection seem to operate on different sets of traits. Overall, our results stress the role of multiple receivers on the evolution of multiple signals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01091.x

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Territorial behaviour is a key component of mating success in peacocks and during this time intra-sexual agonistic behaviour is frequent among the birds.

    “Territorial behaviour is a key component of mating success in peacocks and during this time intra-sexual agonistic behaviour is frequent among the birds21.”
  • During the breeding season, male peacocks establish and defend territories on the lek.

    “During the breeding season, males establish and defend territories on the lek21.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loyau, A., Jalme, M. S., & Sorci, G.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (FR)
Corresponding author
Loyau, Adeline
Venue
Ethology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-07-28
Volume
111
Issue
9
Pages
810-820
ISSN
  • 0179-1613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-0310
OpenAlex
W2143828966
Cited by
86
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ethology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
Keywords
peacock, Pavo cristatus, sexual selection, intrasexual selection, intersexual selection, multiple signals, multiple receivers, ocelli, female mate choice, mating success, male-male competition, animal communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review