Cited by 109Plant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesPlant Disease Resistance and GeneticsFungal Plant Pathogen Control

Morphological, Pathological and Molecular Variability in Colletotrichum capsici, the Cause of Fruit Rot of Chillies in the Subtropical Region of North‐western India

Open access
Sharma, P. N., Kaur, M., Sharma, O. P., Sharma, P., Pathania, A.·2005·Journal of Phytopathology

Abstract

Fruit rot of chillies (Capsicum annuum L.), caused by Colletotrichum capsici under tropical and subtropical conditions, results in qualitative and quantitative yield losses. Based on variation in cultural and morphological traits of C. capsici populations, 37 isolates were categorized into five groups designated, respectively, as Cc‐I, Cc‐II, Cc‐III, Cc‐IV and Cc‐V. In culture, most of the isolates produced cottony, fluffy or suppressed colonies. However, no significant differences were noticed in shape and size of conidia. The reaction of the 37 isolates on an indigenously developed differential set of Capsicum cultivars indicated the existence of different virulences in Himachal Pradesh (HP) chilli populations. Fifteen pathotypes of the pathogen were characterized from various chilli‐growing regions of HP. Pathotype CCP‐1 was most virulent and attacked all the differential cultivars. The genetic relationship between five morphological groups recognized within C. capsici was investigated using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis. Molecular polymorphism generated by RAPD confirmed the variation in virulences of C. capsici and different isolates were grouped into five clusters. However, four isolates (Cc‐5, Cc‐33, Cc‐29 and Cc‐37) exhibited identical RAPD haplotypes. The pathological and RAPD grouping of isolates suggested no correlation among the test isolates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2005.00959.x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharma, P. N., Kaur, M., Sharma, O. P., Sharma, P., & Pathania, A.
Affiliations
Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Sharma, P. N.
  • Kaur, M.
  • Sharma, O. P.
  • Sharma, P.
  • Pathania, A.
Venue
Journal of Phytopathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-04
Volume
153
Issue
4
Pages
232-237
ISSN
  • 0931-1785 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-0434
OpenAlex
W2064382499
Cited by
109
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Phytopathology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
Colletotrichum capsici, chilli fruit rot, Capsicum annuum, pathotype diversity, virulence, RAPD polymorphism, genetic variation, morphological groups, Himachal Pradesh

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review