The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Itraconazole: An Overview
Abstract
Summary:Itraconazole (R 51211) is the prototype of a class of triazole antifungals characterized by a high lipophilicity. This property determines to a large extent the pharmacokinetics of itraconazole and differentiates it from the hydrophilic triazole antifungal fluconazole. The pharmacokinetics of itraconazole in man are characterized by a good oral absorption, an extensive tissue distribution with tissue concentrations many times higher than in plasma, a relatively long elimination half‐life of about one day and a biotransformation into a large number of metabolites. One of them, hydroxy‐itraconazole, is antifungally active and explains why antifungal plasma levels, when measured by bioassay, are about three times the itraconazole levels measured by a specific HPLC‐method. Distribution studies have shown that therapeutically active levels of itraconazole are maintained much longer in some infected tissues than in plasma. For instance, active levels persist for four days in the vaginal epithelium after a one‐day treatment and for 3 weeks in the stratum cor‐neum of the skin after treatment has been stopped. Unlike fluconazole, itraconazole does not interfere with mammalian drug metabolizing enzymes, minimizing the risk of interaction with concomitantly administered drugs. These pharmacokinetic properties may contribute to the high eficacy and safety of itraconazole in patients with various mycotic infections. New pharmaceutical formulations are being explored in order to broaden the application field of itraconazole to intravenous and oral therapy of patients with malabsorption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grant, S. M., & Clissold, S. P. (1990) · Drugs · doi:10.2165/00003495-199039060-00006 · Cited by 661
Cited by
Rex, J. H., Pfaller, M. A., Galgiani, J. N., Bartlett, M. S., Espinel-Ingroff, A., Ghannoum, M. A., Lancaster, M., Odds, F. C., Rinaldi, M. G., Walsh, T. J., et al. (1997) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/clinids/24.2.235 · Cited by 855
Tissue Penetration of Antifungal Agents
Felton, T., Troke, P. F., & Hope, W. W. (2014) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00046-13 · Cited by 426
Pharmacokinetics of antifungal drugs: practical implications for optimized treatment of patients
Bellmann, R., & Smuszkiewicz, P. (2017) · Infection · doi:10.1007/s15010-017-1042-z · Cited by 389
Nett, J. E., & Andes, D. R. (2016) · Infectious Disease Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.idc.2015.10.012 · Cited by 351
De Beule, K., & Van Gestel, J. (2001) · Drugs · doi:10.2165/00003495-200161001-00003 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Heykants, J., Van Peer, A., Van de Velde, V., Van Rooy, P., Meuldermans, W., Lavrijsen, K., Woestenborghs, R., Van Cutsem, J., & Cauwenbergh, G.
- Venue
- Mycoses
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-11
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- s1
- Pages
- 67-87
- ISSN
- 0027-5557 (ISSN-L)
- 0933-7407
- 1439-0507
- OpenAlex
- W2056863521
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Itraconazole: An Overview. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1439-0507.1989.tb02296.x
- The paper
- Heykants, J., Van Peer, A., Van de Velde, V., Van Rooy, P., Meuldermans, W., Lavrijsen, K., Woestenborghs, R., Van Cutsem, J., & Cauwenbergh, G. (1989). The Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Itraconazole: An Overview. Mycoses. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0507.1989.tb02296.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.