Cited by 41Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityHIV/AIDS oral health manifestationsFungal Infections and Studies

Itraconazol‐Suspension in der Behandlung HIV‐infizierter Patienten mit Fluconazol‐resistenter oropharyngealer Candida‐Infektion und Soorösophagitis

Eichel, M., Just‐Nübling, Gudrun, Helm, Eilke Brigitte, Stille, W.·1996·Mycoses

Abstract

Forty AIDS patients suffering from fluconazole-resistant oropharyngeal candidosis were treated with oral itraconazole solution (200-800 mg/day). In 39/49 patients the disease could be initially cured or significantly improved. In contrast to the good clinical results, however, only in six patients a yeast count reduction was observed, and in four patients unchanged high yeast counts persisted. The main pathogen was C. albicans. Even in longtime treatment itraconazole solution was well tolerated. In two patients only the therapy had to be stopped due to the increase of transaminases. Considerable individual deviations in serum concentrations of itraconazole or hydroxy-itraconazole, respectively, were observed which correlated only to a minor degree with clinical and mycological results. Application of itraconazole in a soluble preparation caused an increase in efficacy due to simultaneous local and systemic action. In the case of resistance to fluconazole the itraconazole solution is a valuable alternative to the administration of amphotericin B which is rich in adverse reactions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1439-0507.1996.tb00514.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Between 64% and 80% of patients with fluconazole-refractory oropharyngeal candidiasis respond to itraconazole solution.

    “Between 64% and 80% of patients with fluconazole-refractory infections will respond to treatment with itraconazole solution [268][269][270].”

    From Guidelines for Treatment of Candidiasis (2004) · cites this paper as [269]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eichel, M., Just‐Nübling, G., Helm, E. B., & Stille, W.
Affiliations
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
Just‐Nübling, Gudrun
Venue
Mycoses
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-04
Volume
39
Issue
s1
Pages
102-106
ISSN
  • 0027-5557 (ISSN-L)
  • 0933-7407
  • 1439-0507
OpenAlex
W2008368990
Cited by
41
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mycoses (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › HIV/AIDS oral health manifestations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
oropharyngeal candidiasis, esophageal candidiasis, AIDS, Candida albicans, antifungal therapy, serum drug concentration, treatment tolerability, dual therapy
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Candida, Candida albicans, Candidiasis, Candidiasis, Oral, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Esophageal Diseases, Esophagitis, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Suspensions, HIV Infections, Fluconazole, AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections, Itraconazole

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review