Cited by 79Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementHealthcare Systems and Technology

Better, sooner, more convenient: A successful teledermoscopy service

Open access
Lim, David, Oakley, Amanda MM, Rademaker, Marius·2012·Australasian Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

Background/Objectives: A virtual lesion clinic (VLC) using store‐and‐forward teledermoscopy was introduced to reduce waiting times and improve access for skin lesion assessment by dermatologists. We aimed to review the efficiency and patient acceptance of a new community‐based teledermoscopy service by comparing it to hospital‐based face‐to‐face (FTF) skin lesion clinics. Methods: A prospective study compared patient flow through a community‐based VLC and a tertiary hospital FTF dermatology clinic. Surveys were sent to patients and their referring doctors after attendance. Waiting times, diagnosis, outcomes, financial costs, patient acceptability and convenience were compared. Results: A total of 300 patients were assessed; 200 were seen in the VLC and 100 in the conventional FTF clinic. Of the 200 patients seen in the VLC, 88% did not require a subsequent FTF clinic assessment to establish the diagnosis. Mean waiting times for first assessment were reduced by two thirds (from 114 days to 39 days) in those seen by the VLC compared to FTF. Financial analysis demonstrated cost savings of 14%. Surveyed patients were highly satisfied and confident in the VLC service. Conclusions: A community‐based teledermoscopy service may allow improved management of outpatient referrals while providing a better, quicker and more convenient service. It may also provide cost savings, as teledermoscopy assessment can be cheaper than traditional assessment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2011.00836.x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The screening alternatives and attribute levels were chosen based on results of three previous surveys in the target group, a literature review, and included important screening outcome, financial and convenience considerations.

    “These alternatives, and the different attribute levels over which they vary, were chosen based on the results of three previous surveys undertaken in the target group [11], as well as a literature review [14, 16-22, 27, 28] and included important screening outcome, financial and convenience considerations.”
  • Many of the results supporting the importance of particular attributes in this study are in concordance with previous literature on consumer satisfaction with teledermoscopy or teledermatology.

    “Many of the results found supporting the importance of particular attributes in this study are in concordance with the previous literature focusing on consumer satisfaction with teledermoscopy or teledermatology more broadly [14,18,19,27,28].”
  • Asynchronous tele-dermatology is significantly more convenient than synchronous tele-dermatology because the treating dermatologist has discretion to schedule an appropriate consultation time.

    “Asynchronous tele-dermatology is considered significantly more convenient than synchronous because the treating dermatologist has the discretion to schedule an appropriate consultation time (Lim et al., 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lim, D., Oakley, A. M., & Rademaker, M.
Affiliations
Waikato Hospital (NZ)
Corresponding author
Oakley, Amanda MM
Venue
Australasian Journal of Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12-29
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
22-25
ISSN
  • 0004-8380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-0960
OpenAlex
W1523521122
Cited by
79
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australasian Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
Keywords
teledermoscopy, store-and-forward telemedicine, skin lesion assessment, waiting time, patient satisfaction, cost reduction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Child, Preschool, Community Health Services, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Research, Hospital Departments, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Referral and Consultation, Skin Diseases, Waiting Lists, Patient Satisfaction, Telemedicine, Dermoscopy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review