Cited by 52Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health servicesGlobal Health Workforce Issues

Challenges faced by general practitioners and allied mental health services in providing mental health services in rural Queensland

Bambling, Matthew, Kavanagh, David, Lewis, Gisela, King, Robert, King, David, Sturk, Heidi, Turpin, Merrill, Gallois, Cindy +1 more·2007·Australian Journal of Rural Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the views of rural practitioners concerning issues and challenges in mental health service delivery and possible solutions. DESIGN: A qualitative study using individual semi-structured interviews. SETTING: Eight general practices from eight rural Queensland towns, three rural mental health services and two non-government organisations, with interviews being conducted before recent changes in government-subsidised access to allied health practitioners. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 37 GPs, 19 Queensland Health mental health staff and 18 participants from community organisations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Analysis of qualitative themes from questions about the key mental health issues facing the town, how they might be addressed and what challenges would be faced in addressing them. RESULTS: There was substantial consensus that there are significant problems with inter-service communication and liaison, and that improved collaboration and shared care will form a critical part of any effective solution. Differences between groups reflected differing organisational contexts and priorities, and limitations to the understanding each had of the challenges that other groups were facing. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements to mental health staffing and to access to allied health might increase the ability of GPs to meet the needs of less complex patients, but specific strategies to promote better integrated services are required to address the needs of rural and regional patients with complex mental health problems. The current study provides a baseline against which effects of recent initiatives to improve mental health care can be assessed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2007.00866.x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Bambling, M., Kavanagh, D., Lewis, G., King, R., King, D., Sturk, H., Turpin, M., Gallois, C., & Bartlett, H.
Affiliations
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Bambling, Matthew
Venue
Australian Journal of Rural Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-04
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
126-130
ISSN
  • 1038-5282 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1584
OpenAlex
W128292824
Cited by
52
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian Journal of Rural Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Funders
  • Queensland Health
  • Australian Government
  • University of Queensland
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
Keywords
rural mental health services, general practitioners, allied health services, mental health service delivery, shared care, integrated care, mental health staffing, rural Queensland
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Communication, Community Mental Health Services, Continuity of Patient Care, Cooperative Behavior, Health Priorities, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Research, Humans, Interinstitutional Relations, Organizations, Physicians, Family, Psychiatry, Queensland, Surveys and Questionnaires, Referral and Consultation, Total Quality Management, Rural Health Services, Case Management, Needs Assessment, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review