Cited by 85Mental Health Treatment and AccessAgriculture and Farm SafetyRural development and sustainability

Improving the mental health of rural New South Wales communities facing drought and other adversities: RURAL ADVERSITY MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAM

Open access
Hart, Craig Richard, Berry, Helen Louise, Tonna, Anne Maree·2011·Australian Journal of Rural Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: NSW has just experienced its worst drought in a century. As years passed with insufficient rain, drought-related mental health problems became evident on farms. Our objective is to describe how, in response, the Rural Adversity Mental Health Program was introduced in 2007 to raise awareness of drought-related mental health needs and help address these needs in rural and remote NSW. The program has since expanded to include other forms of rural adversity, including recent floods. SETTING: Rural NSW. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS: Designed around community development principles, health, local service networks and partner agencies collaborated to promote mental health, education and early intervention. Strategies included raising mental health literacy, organising community social events and disseminating drought-related information. Priority areas were Aboriginal communities, older farmers, young people, women, primary health care and substance use. RESULTS: Over 3000 people received mental health literacy training in the four years of operation from 2007 to 2010. Stakeholders collaborated to conduct hundreds of mental health-related events attended by thousands of people. A free rural mental health support telephone line provided crisis help and referral to rural mental health-related services. CONCLUSION: Drought affected mental health in rural NSW. A community development model was accepted and considered effective in helping communities build capacity and resilience in the face of chronic drought-related hardship. Given the scale, complexity and significance of drought impacts and rural adjustment, and the threats posed by climate change, a long-term approach to funding such programs would be appropriate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2011.01225.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study from rural Australia described a community development model incorporating health promotion, education, and early intervention as accepted and considered effective in helping communities build capacity and resilience in the face of chronic drought-related hardship.

    “A study from rural Australia has described how a community development model, incorporating elements of health promotion, education, and early intervention, was accepted and considered effective in helping communities build capacity and resilience in the face of chronic drought-related hardship [85].”

    From Climate Change and Mental Health: A Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [85]

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hart, C. R., Berry, H. L., & Tonna, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Rural and Remote Mental Health (AU)
  • University of Canberra (AU)
Corresponding author
Berry, Helen Louise
Venue
Australian Journal of Rural Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-09-21
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
231-238
ISSN
1038-5282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1520314548
Cited by
85
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
FWCI
12.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australian Journal of Rural Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Canberra Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Newcastle Australia
  • New South Wales Government
  • NSW Department of Primary Industries
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture and Farm Safety
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Rural development and sustainability
Keywords
drought, rural mental health, mental health literacy, community development, Aboriginal communities, elderly farmers, community resilience, early intervention, floods, New South Wales
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Attitude to Health, Cultural Characteristics, Disasters, Female, Health Promotion, Health Services, Indigenous, Health Status, Humans, Male, Mental Health, New South Wales, Rural Population, Social Support, Rural Health Services, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review