Cited by 14Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

ANTINOCICEPTIVE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN ANANDAMIDE AND ENDOMORPHIN‐1 AT THE SPINAL LEVEL

Tuboly, Gabor, Mecs, Laszlo, Benedek, György, Horvath, Gyöngyi·2009·Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology

Abstract

SUMMARY: Although it is well known that the combined administration of synthetic or plant‐originated opioids with cannabinoids (CB) results in synergistic antinociception, the effects of combined administration of endogenous ligands acting at µ‐opioid and CB receptors are not known. The aim of the present study was to determine the interaction between anandamide (AEA; a CB 1 receptor agonist) and endomorphin‐1 (EM‐1; a µ‐opioid receptor agonist) after intrathecal administration. Nociception was assessed by the paw‐withdrawal test after carrageenan‐induced inflammation in male Wistar rats. Endomorphin‐1 (16.4 pmol to 16.4 nmol) and AEA (4.3–288 nmol) alone dose‐dependently decreased carrageenan‐induced thermal hyperalgesia, although the highest dose of AEA also exhibited pain‐inducing potential. The potency of AEA was approximately 59‐fold lower than that of EM‐1 (35% effective dose (ED 35) 194.4 vs 3.3 nmol, respectively). Coadministration of these ligands revealed that combinations of 16.4 pmol EM‐1 plus 28.8 or 86.5 nmol AEA were more effective than either drug alone, but other combinations were no more effective than the administration of EM‐1 itself. Therefore, coadministration of AEA did not significantly shift the dose–response curve to EM‐1. The results of the present study indicate that the coadministration of AEA and EM‐1 results in potentiated antihyperalgesia only for a combination of specific doses. Because AEA activates other receptor types (e.g. TRPV1) in addition to CB 1 receptors, the results of the present suggest that, after the coadministration of EM‐1 and AEA, complex interactions ensue that may lead to different outcomes compared with those seen following the injection of exogenous ligands.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2008.05081.x

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tuboly, G., Mecs, L., Benedek, G., & Horvath, G.
Affiliations
University of Szeged (HU)
Venue
Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-03-26
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
400-405
ISSN
  • 0305-1870 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1681
OpenAlex
W2129278228
Cited by
14
References
46
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
anandamide, endomorphin-1, antinociception, CB1 receptor, mu-opioid receptor, opioid-cannabinoid interaction, synergistic analgesia, carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia, intrathecal administration, thermal hyperalgesia, endocannabinoids
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Animals, Arachidonic Acids, Carrageenan, Drug Combinations, Drug Interactions, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Hyperalgesia, Inflammation, Injections, Spinal, Male, Oligopeptides, Pain, Spine, Time Factors, Rats, Wistar, Rats, Polyunsaturated Alkamides, Endocannabinoids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review